Rekha.....
05 February 2009 at 20:51
Dear Sirs/Ma'am
Please appreciate this
Our client has insurance policy of Rs.1,00,000=00. After its maturity the same policy renewed for Rs. 1,25,000=00.
What will be our client’s position?
1. Whether our client will be entitled to get Rs. 1,25,000=00
2. Ins.Co.’s bounden duty to pay insurance claim Of Rs.1,00,000=00 only to our client .
3. Or according to the Insurance Provision the said Policy will be considered as a New
Policy.
Please guide us the points of defence also and what we should appreciate in favour of our client i.e. applicant.
Thanks in anticipation of ur valuable advice.
a.s. sharma
05 February 2009 at 20:49
which court do i go to if i have to file a petition under s.397 of the companies act in respect of a private limited company.
mura4u
05 February 2009 at 19:15
hello friends
if the spouse is abscounding since 9 yeas it leads to divorce according the law so am in need of the GO&MS copie so please send me the copie to me
Olivia
05 February 2009 at 15:37
This is with regards to a contract employment-- we 2 employees employed on a contract by an indian contractor but working for an MNC from the past 25 & 12 years respectively.. Off late we are having a lot of issues with our contract..It has not been renewed from the past six months but we have been receiving salary.. Now they tried taking one employee out but was not able to do as is surfaced the contract documentation was inappropriate.. Now they have been asked by the MNC to close this contract and put us in the indian pay role.. The contractor wants us to sign a document of acceptance on the same.. They will pay us us PF accumulated and gratuity.. they want us to wipe the years of service we have put in.. and start fresh in the new company , but we are reluctant as we know we wont be in that employment for more than 6 months as then they have a right to check us out.. Secondly can we claim retrenchment compensation due to closure of the old contract or any way to account for the years we have put it...
Request an urgent response as this will have to be closed by next month
ram
05 February 2009 at 12:12
If Court Cancel a Sale deed , what is the procicure taken in Sub Registrar office.
Such deed Can execute by Court or by The person whom owner of the property
Jainodin shaikh
05 February 2009 at 11:12
What is the exact meaning and deference beween Advocate,
Lawyer,
Barrister,
Counsel,
Attorney, and
Pleader?
M. PIRAVI PERUMAL
05 February 2009 at 10:56
Can any of our members provide me the full text of the Delhi High Court Judgement permitting the restaurants and star hotels collecting in excess of the MRP.
allurisivajiraju
05 February 2009 at 08:17
Respected Seniors,
In a Partition suit, in the plaint some of the necessary parties to the suit are not added as parties by the PLintiffs.
Then the defendants taken a defence in their written statement about the non joinder of necessary parties to the suit.
Then Hon'ble Court framed issues exect the non joinder of necessary parties. Immediately the Defendants filed a petition to frame as issue about non joinder of necessary parties to the suit and the said petition was allowed by the Court.
In this case I am appearing for defendants.
In the above circustances is there any chance to dismiss the suit without conducting trial by Hon'Court since the plaintiffs are intentionally not mentioned their own family members as necessary parties to the suit?
Kamlesh soni
04 February 2009 at 22:27
Sir, my one client's accidental case i handle properly from last four year. now the case nearly the solution.other advocates r interfer to the my clients and ready to give him some benifit more than me .so my clients now wants to change advocate. i have spend some money to gather the documents and etc. now what i have to do?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
contempt /disobedience of order of court
R/Sir
I was success bidder for supply of sulphuric acid in a govt. plant,being success bidder acid was supplied by me on demand of plant,after one month without any reason or intimating me plant officer stopped my supply & called short term tender for the supply of acid for the same period for which my tender was going on.Being aggrieved i contacted to concern officers,they replied as now the rate of acid in market is much less than rete on which you are supplying us acid,i told them it is wrong as first of all there is no any down fall in rates secondly there was no any such condition in our contract that during the tender term if there is any down fall in rates govt. plant officers are free to call fresh tenders,ultimately i filed a civil suit & succeeded in getting injunction order from the court in my favour,court ordered defendent not to call/open fresh tender till further order of the court,now problem is that plant is still receiving acid from the open market & they are not receiving acid from me being success bidder/tenderer.Now question is this whether it is contempt of court or not,i want to file an application against defendent for contempt/disobedience of court order.plz help me.Thanks