G. ARAVINTHAN
03 February 2009 at 08:42
Impact of joint family in muslim?
Whether muslim law recognizes joint family property or joint family business?
Can any one say about applicability of joint family concept or joint family property/business with citations?
Mohammad Ali
03 February 2009 at 00:17
Hi,
Need your help to understand onces right of information to obtain aganist a registred trust in my locality.
We have a registred Trust runed by some old timers and this trust run a school too, we some people in this are feel that people in trust are mis approprating the funds and property of trust hence need to take some action. What are our rights being citizen of this area?? can we file a RTI to know the modus opernudi of operation ??? do this kind of trusts cover under RTI act????? please help.
ravi
02 February 2009 at 22:18
WE ARE OPERATING PIZZAHUT RESTAURANT IN A FOOD COURT IN A IT PARK
IT PARK HAS OBTAINED ELECTRICITY CONNECTIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT AND SUPPLIED POWER THROUGH INTERNAL METERS SET BY IT TO FOOD COURT
WE, AS TENANTS OF FOOD COURT RECEIVES FROM AGAIN FROM SUBMETERS
NOW WHEN THE EB DEPARTMENT RAISES BILL TO IT PARK - IT PARKS RAISES DEBIT NOTE TO FOOD COURT OPERATORS AND IN TURN FOOD COURT OPERATIORS RAISES DEBIT NOTE ON US
FOOD COURT ALONG WIHT EB CHARGES PER UNIT ALSO CHARGED SERVICE TAX
IS IT OK ?
TO MY KNOWLEDGE WHEN EB DEPARTMENT IS NOT CHARGING SERVICE TAX TO IT PARK
WHY IT PARK IS CHARGING TO FOOD COURT AND FOOD COURT OPERATORS IN TURN CHARGING SERVICE TAX ON RESTAURANTS.
COULD YOU PLEASE ADVISE
1. SERVICE TAX APPLICABILITY ON EB SERVICE
2. WHETHER ABOVE CASE IS OK
Member (Account Deleted)
02 February 2009 at 20:10
On 17-01-2008 ( about 18-30 pm ), One of my friend filed his revised return of Income for the assessment year 2008-2009 electronically. Acknowledgement is to be submited to ITO within 15 days time. Acknowledgement was filed on 02-02-09 to concerned ITO.
31-01-2009 and 01-02-2009 being Saturday and Sunday Income tax office was closed, hence could not file the acknowledgement within 15 days time limit.Will it amounts to late filing? At the time of submission of acknowledgement, counter clerk acknowledged with remark 'LATE FILING". Kindly guide me as to whether acknowledgement was filed within time or late?
Tirumalesh sharma
02 February 2009 at 19:53
what is the pro. to file janhit yachika(pil)& how much court fee to file case
Mohamed Ali
02 February 2009 at 17:42
A Sunni hanafi Family partition suit is decreed. As per decree male is entitle for 2/17th share and female is entitle for 1/17th share in the property.
The Decree schedule properties were of two types town property and revenue lands, Court ordered to appoint commissioner to divide town properties and for revenue lands the schedule of revenue properties were sent to respective deputy commissioners office
For survey and partition. As per decree
Final decree petition is filed in 1989 to divide the shares as per decree. For town properties commissioner was appointed and he divided the properties as per decree in the year 1995 and some parties were not satisfied, hence the file RFA and moved to high court and the appeal were dismissed and part of Final decree proceedings for town properties got completed in 1995.
The another part of same Final decree proceedings is till pending for division of revenue lands as per decree,
Some LR�s of one plaintiff who are not entitle for share as per Mohameddan law were brought on record in 1989 along with their other heirs, when petition for final decree proceedings was filed,
Even these LR�s have been allotted share in the town properties for which part of final decree proceedings completed in 1995 in the same pending final decree proceedings. As we were not following the case we did not object till now, But now we have filed a Interlocutory application in the pending Final decree proceedings to strike out LR�s of plaintiff who are not entitle for share,
As the Final decree proceedings for town properties got completed in 1995 and now the only the execution is pending for town properties,
We want to take back the town properties allotted to these LR�s who are not entitle for share, Our advocate says we have to file a separate suit it cannot be done in this pending final decree proceedings of revenue lands as part of final decree proceedings for town properties completed in 1995.
Is it right can we can question in this part of pending Final decree proceedings to take back the town properties allotted to those LR�s who are not entitle for share or we have to file a separate suit to get back town properties.
Shonee Kapoor
02 February 2009 at 17:28
Dear Sir,
I am a relatively new member at lawyersclubindia forum. I have been impressed by your knowledge and sharing on the forum. However, there is one particular question, on which I have not got satisfactory reply, hence bothering you over PM.
I have been fighting a case u/s 498-A/ 406. I have also been charged with various other cases like 506 and assualt on multiple times after filing of 498-A case. The reason for the same is that I have refused their demand of Rs. 25 Lacs for settlement and am fighting 498-A case on merit.
Recently I have been acquitted in one case of threatening, physical assault and attempt to snatch the child along with another case under Domestic Violence.
I want the police to act under 182IPC for the wrong information given to them to file these other cases against me. However, the police is not acting on it. And on the top of it, they have lodged another complaint of threatening and physical assault.
I have been given to understand that I can not lodge a private complaint under 182IPC as CrPC 195 bars it. Does that mean that I am remedyless against their false complaints, if police does not lodge a case against them.
And if I am remedyless would I keep on fighting successive cases of 506 and 323? Is there no remedy against it.
Your valued opinion would be very helpful.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
Ranganath
02 February 2009 at 17:16
Ld Counsels, I am falsely implicated by my wife and father in law. My FIL gave a complaint stating that I demanded 10 lakhs for living with his daughter. After one month police took another statement from my wife that says I am not interested to live with her and I am demanding money even to give divorce. If she wanted divorce she should have approached family court instead. The fact that we attended couseling before going to police is not revealed in teh first statement. Also the FIR is filed after one month since the compliant is lodged. This is a counterblast for my petition in family court under section 9 of HMA. My wife has left my home with all her things and threatening me to give money. Can this FIR be quashed. There is no mention of date and place of dowry demand, the statement that she seeks divorce and his fathers statement that I demanded money to live with her is contradicting. Also pls tell me if police can tamper with statemetns made and further complicate the matter. I have not received summons from court. FIR registered on 10th Nov 2008.
Jainodin shaikh
02 February 2009 at 16:17
(1) Whethe accused person can apoint a new lawyer without obtaing N.O.C. from his previously apointed lawyer?
(2) Is it necessary to obtain N.O.C. before filing new Vakaalatnama in a criminal matter?
(3) Can a lawyer defend the accused in criminal matter without filing Vakaalatnama?
(4) under which provisions of law?
(5) Is there any caselaw to clear this point?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cenvat Credit
Need list of Services which can be taken as cenvat credit for contactor