Legal Eagle
13 February 2009 at 16:56
Suppose a woman employee after the maternity leave resumes office for a day or so and tenders her resignation, in that case can an employer not give her the maternity benefits. Are there any provisions / judgments where an employer is entitled not to pay any maternity benefits?
Also which section of the Act provides for paternity leave?
Pandian
13 February 2009 at 14:06
Hi Friends,
Recently on 21-01-2009 Honourable Supreme Court of India has given judgement on the proof of reimbursement in the cases of LTA / Conveyance Allowance is not required.
Income Tax Act 1961 - Sections 10(5) and 192.
Need more clarity on this portion. Whether all the reimbursment portions are not required supporting documents (SEc 192) or else ?
What is Conveyance Allowance (Rs.800 ??)? is all fuel & maintenance reimbursements are meant "conveyance" ?
Please clarify to panscons@yahoo.co.in .
09940035574
rajendra
13 February 2009 at 13:57
Mr. X executed a irrecovable power of attorney in favour of Mr. Y for a land(unregistered)now mr. x is dead. Can the Mr. Y give convenyance of the property to the third person??
What the the validity of unregistered POA.
In POA there is a para "THAT THIS POA SHALL BE IRREVOCABLE UNIT THE COMPLETION OF THE REGISTRATION OF THE DEDS OF CONVEYANCES IN RESPECT OF THE SAID LAND AND SHALL CONTINUE TO REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AND IN OPERATIONS DURING THE SAID PERIOD NOTWITHSTANDING MY DEATH OR NAY OTHER CAUSE"
Rajeev Chaturvedi
13 February 2009 at 10:01
is nbfc attract operating lease business
pls resolve my problem. is there any requirement to start operating lease business. plse write
Sukhija
13 February 2009 at 07:54
Hi everybody,
1. Can a muslim husband bequeth all his property movable and immovable to his sons and daughters according to his wish, not in equal share?
2. Can he bequeth his first wife's property to her sons and daughters as per his wish, not in equal shares?
3. Can he prevent his second wife from interferring the right and possession of the said property bequeth to his children?
P.Muthusamy
12 February 2009 at 17:06
My friend's brother X had some enmity with my friend Y regarding a property. The case regarding the propety is in the court. Once
X scolded Y's wife pretending that she had tresspassed his property which is under dipute.Y's wife complained to the police about this. The SI called X to the police station. But X didnt turned up. The matter was subjected to its natural end.
One week ago Mr.X left the town and during that time My frined while crossing the property building he had a terible electic shock when he touched the wall of the locked house situated in the propery.
At once he was taken to a near by clinic and after some time he complained about this at the police station. The S.I visited the spot and arranged with the E.B to disconnect the supply to the house.
At that time the SI told that he will take actiono againstX when he returns to the town.
Yesterday X returned to town and the SI called X to the station.But as usual he didnt bothered. But today he came to the police station and told to the SI that he is innocent and as he was out of station he has nothing to say about the incidence and he is totally unware of that.
However The SI received a statement from X that he has not commited any crime and he will not do in future also.
But My friend is totally disappinted with this and he feels as if justice is not done to him.
The SI has not attempted to see what Mr X has done in the locked house to give electric shock when any one touches.
In one or two days Mr X will return to the house. ( He is having another house in the town and he will use this house also frequenty)
My friend Y says that when X opens the house he will dismantle all the elctrical connections and will pretend as if the shock was due to some electrical leakage in the wire.
How to establish the truth and what action my friend must take. It seems that the SI is favouring Mr X for reasons unknown
SOURABH
12 February 2009 at 16:58
Hi good evening sir,
can you tell me about the procedure to become an income tax officer. what type of exam is conducted to become an income tax officer. what are the qualifications to become an income tax officer. do reply me as early as possible.
CA. Vinod Malhotra
12 February 2009 at 16:14
Can a sales tax demand against a ltd co., recovered from its directors? If yes then remedies and if no then any citation/case.
S K R P GUPTA
12 February 2009 at 15:58
After filing the Income Tax Returns online, without using the DSC, is it necessory to Deposit or Submit the ITR-V form with the Respective Assessing officer or respective Incomet Tax Office? or we can submit to the nearest Income Tax office anywhere in India?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
departmental proceedings
In West Bengal Police and Kolkata Police, in departmental proceedings the disciplinary authority appoints the Enquiry Officer to hold enquiry proceedings against the charged officer. The enquiring officer while holding the proceeding also acts as the prosecuting officer on behalf of the disciplinary authority.No separate Presenting Officer is appointed by the disciplinary authority to represent the case on behalf of the Department though defence assistant is permitted by him in favour of the charged officer. On his findings in enquiry report the disciplinary authority imposes the penalties exonerates the charged officer. My query is that whether an enquiring officer appointed by the disciplinary authority can act as a prosecuting officer also? Is it lawful for disciplinary authority to entrust the enquiry authority to act on behalf of him in holding the enquiry? Is it not the violation of principles of natural justice and an act of departmental bias that the enquiring officer holding the Quasi judicial power should act on behalf of the prosecution also? What the law says? Kindly enlighten me with the relevant rulings of apex court or any other court which is guideline on such issues. What is the legal status of such enquiries imposing the penalties on the charged officer? Kindly respond.