Anil
18 June 2008 at 17:57
1)Can a person gift money to his spouse without attracting Sec.64 of the Income Tax Act ? Note that the person does not genuinely would want to have any right over the money given to his spouse
2)A person has given money to his wife. The wife invests the money in NSC. In the given case Section 64 of Income Tax is attracted for the interest accrued on NSC.
I would like to know whether the person can claim deduction u/s 80C for the money invested in NSC. Note that the NSC certificates are in the name of his wife.
Kindly answer pointwise in the order question is being asked.Thank you.
jayati
18 June 2008 at 16:45
Any Supreme Court Judgement regarding claim for compensation against a lawyer. If any please send me the detail with the copy of the judgement.
aj
18 June 2008 at 14:47
URGENT:i have a small trading firm in delhi.i had only 1 employee working with me for the last 4-5 years.he has now sent me a notice saying that he was drawing a salary of 2,500 for the last 20 years of service.he has not come for work and has claimed that we have thrown him our with verbal abuses and manhandling.i was not maintaining any records attendance/leave register.no appointment letter was given to him.he now claims settlement charges.how much is he entitled to get.am i liable to maintain records register.can i claim him to be a casual temporary worker?he used to go to our bank to withdraw cash from bearer cheques under his name from our savings account
what can the labour court charge for non maintaining any records?or how much will i have to spend to fight my case?how long and where will the cases be fought.
how much should i spend on settlement?
i am filing nil/negligible sales tax returns for the last 4 years
umapathi.s
18 June 2008 at 14:43
sir,the bank has initiated proceedings under securitisation Act against me for non-payment of loan installment after wrongfully terminating me from service. the loan was sanctioned to me under staff category at concessional rate and repayment was used to be deducted from my salary. After wrongful termination from service, the matter is before the High Court and now is at final stage of hearing. during this process I was out of salary and hence my loan was treted as NPA on account of non-payement of installment linked to salary. despite my request bank is continuing its proceedings for symbolic possession under the ACt. I am unable to pay any amount due to severe financial problems. I am requesting the bank to wait till the disposal of the case before the High Court of Karnataka which can decide about my reinstament and backwages so that incase of favourable order, I can pay out of the backwages towards the overdue.morevoer, I am requesting the bank to adjust the overdue from my PF Balance laying with the bank. since the bank had taken Lien on my PF at the time of relaese of Loan so that I may be relieved of my immediate possession of property.so, i am in fix since the bank is neither waiting till the dispoal of the case before the High Court nor giving me my retirement benefits . they are maintaining that PF is additional SEcurity and the case before the High court is independent action and can't be linked to Securitisaiton Proceedings.What are my alternative ? kindly advise with any decision of the earlier court judgement.can the bank continue its proceddings when the matter of employee and employeer relationship is penidng to be decdided. since the Loan was sanctioned under staff Category and that relationship of staff and the bank is in dispute. please advise.
baljit singh
18 June 2008 at 14:42
Hi,
its baljit here,
i have a querry whether the Sessions court for the purpose of disposing of bail applcation u/s section 439 can allow the applicant to undgo medical examination the report of which may provide an evidence to disprove the commission againt him as the applicant do have right to do so U/s section 54 of the Cr.P.C if the same is no exercised earlier upon his production before the illaka magistrate. if so any law point on this issue.
thanks,
baljit singh advocate.
baljit singh
18 June 2008 at 13:50
hi respected experts,
please let me know whether an application can be moved to the criminal court to ratify its earler order to make it complete and spaking one in terms of the prayer made in applcation already allowed. it may also be clarified whether any such ratification would amount to review of its own order by the court barring any such ratification and further remedy of available to the applciant in case of refusal by the court to make such ratification.
thanks,
baljit singh
baljit singh
18 June 2008 at 13:37
Hi,
its baljit here,
i have a querry whether the sessions court for the purpose of disposing of bail applcation u/s 439 Cr.P.C can allow the applicant to undgo medical examination the report of which may provide an evidence to disprove the commission againt him as the applicant do have right to do so U/s section 54 of the Cr.P.C if the same is no exercised earlier upon his production before the illaka magistrate. if so any law point on this issue.
thanks,
baljit singh advocate.
baljit singh
18 June 2008 at 13:35
Hi,
its baljit here,
i have a querry whether the court for the purpose of disposing of bail applcation can allow the applicant to undgo medical examination the report of which may provide an evidence to disprove the commission againt him as the applicant do have right to do so U/s section 54 of the Cr.P.C if the same is no exercised earlier upon his production before the illaka magistrate. if so any law point on this issue.
thanks,
baljit singh advocate.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Under which section the officer is liable to be booked
Dear sir,
When any government officer does not do his job.
for example:-
(1)does not come in time at his office.
(2)goes early from his office.
(3)delay the work from the stipulated time he or she is bound.
(4)misbehave with the public person.
under which section the concerned employee will be booked.
NEERAJ