Raja Sundarraman
13 June 2008 at 22:10
Respected Learned Friends, recommend artcles on land administation in TamilNadu since 1900.Thanks.
Rajaram C Iyer
13 June 2008 at 20:33
PLease give me a sample complaint for filing a defamation case
k.m.gopinaath
13 June 2008 at 18:37
Hi.. A property was bought my Mrs X in 1985. She dies in 1993. She has 3 married daughters.they give the father a notarized document saying that he is the heir to his wife and they have no objection in selling the property. He gives a power of attorney to another person. the person who took the power can he sell the land. if i buy will that give me a clear title?
actually the daughters have in given a notarised rs100 stamp paper deed " authorise our father (mr X) to get the ownership of the plot...........transferred to his name.we hereby declare we have no objection in doing the same" mr X based on this gave power of atorney to mr y. can i buy from mr.y. he says he (mr y)will give a receipt of assurance for the total amount what are the problems which i will face.
Karunakar
13 June 2008 at 17:22
what are the procedures and support documents required to claim benifit.
Sudheer
13 June 2008 at 16:48
Dear All,
If an employee has completed continuous service of 10 years in a company (Maharashtra)and would like to quit the company & settle the PF Account, will it be possible to get total share of PF deposited in his account (i.e. employees & employer's contribution) or will have to wait for his superannuation / retirement to get the pension fund amount.
Please advise in the matter.
Thanks & Regards,
Sudheer
sudheer_sangamkar@rediffmail.com
Karunakar
13 June 2008 at 16:43
Dear All,
please provide the different exemptions of ESI. speccially about construction field workers.
m.v.prabhakar
13 June 2008 at 15:27
FActs of the case
While prosecuting a public servant in the Criminal case initiated by CBI, Sanction order is required form the appointing authority of that person. CBI Spl. Court takes the cognizance based on the sanction Order.
After cognizance by the court in the year 2001, it was found that the material information given in the said sanction order is not correct and false.
Recalling of summon was initiated and by the time it came for hearing, by virtue of SC judgment in the case of Mr. Adalat Prasad, the court which had given cognizance can not recall the summon. Hence the petition was withdrawn.
Subsequently, discharge application was filed on the ground that
1. The sanction order issued is defective on the information.
2. Entire money mentioned in the sanction order as loss to the company was received by the company as final payment through another court well before the date of sanction order.
3. There by no loss to the company on the date of sanction order.
4. It was further mentioned that compounding is permitted and the decision of Deccan agro was cited.
5. The court also taken cognizance based on the defective sanction order.
6. Argument of charges was not taken place so far.
Due to long delay in the Spl. Court, petition u/s 482 was made in the Delhi HC. It was disposed as
“ It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petition that for the last nine years, he has been facing prosecution but so far even the arguments on charge have not been heard. The concerned court is directed to hear arguments on charge on the date fixed and to pass appropriate orders thereon”.
With these direction, the petition is disposed of.
Query.
1. Is my approach on the defective SANCTION ORDER is correct? Should I take any other precaution/Arguments?
2. What is the remedy available to me against the appointing authority concerned on the malefide/misleading sanction order on the basis of which the court had taken cognizance, which had ruined my career and peace of mind in the past 10 years.
3. Kindly provide me some SC or other HC court decisions on the DEFECTIVE SANCTION ORDER or on the related matters.
4. Sections involved are 120B,421,467,478 of IPC and 13(1)(d) of PCA
Legal_Query
13 June 2008 at 14:18
sir,
a case was filed in 2000 under PFA act, only seller was made accused and manufacturer of the product was not made party to the trial. now after 8 years the prosecution is considering to implead him as a party (still not made). can the manufacturer be impleaded as a party to the case after such long delay. what defense can he take and how delay will effect the trial.
thnks & regds
Mukul Aggarwal
13 June 2008 at 14:01
is consent to establish and environment clearance is necessary for constructing a Shopping Mall...when it is approved by DDA.. water and air clearance is also necessary or not.......
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
diplomas for law students
respected sir\mam
is there any kind of under graduate diplomas offered in symboisis pune for law students,which i can pursue in my vacations and can continue even after vacations.
please tell me as soon as possible
thanks
regards ankit gupta