Bhaskar
04 July 2016 at 19:18
Hi,
I am a student of Campus of Open Learning, Delhi University and I joined for 2 months photography (mass comminication) course in jan 16 but it has been 7 months and my course haven't been completed yet. They dont provide class as their management is too bad. They took only 5-6 classes of 1.5-2 hrs in 7 months but 2 classes in a week is mentioned on the official website of university.
So I need suggestions that where I can get justice as they wasted my money and too much of time. I want my fees refund and as well as certificate of the course. How and where can i submit the complaint against the university?
Please help.
Thanks in advance.
Rohan Pradhan
04 July 2016 at 17:31
The amount deposited under sec 15 (consumer protection Act) for filing the appeal is a statutory fee or can it be released after the disposal of appeal to the appellant.
*This query may be of academic nature, but Section 15 as per my understanding is silent for refund of amount deposited for filing of appeal.
Thanks
Tribhuwan Pandey
04 July 2016 at 17:28
Two parties entered into an unregistered agreement to sell a property of Rs. 4.80 cror. Ninety percent payment has been made but now the seller is avoiding to register the property in buyer's name, buyer is ready to make final payment.
What is the proper civil remedy to get possession and to restrain further sale or recover the money from the seller. Please note agreement to sale is an unregistered document.
DEEPAK DHAMEJA
04 July 2016 at 17:19
I M WORKING WITH ADVOCATE SINCE 3-4 MONTHS I HAVE PAID ABOUT 3 LACS( FOR 10 APPLICATION) IN CASH FOR SHAAHUKARI LICENSE UNDER MAHARASHTRA STATE ACT.
BUT AT THE TIME OF GIVEN APPLICATION WITH ALL DOCUMENTS I WILL GIVE LICENSE WITH IN ONE MONTH AND PROMISE ME I WILL GIVE U A PERSON WHO WILL PAY RENT FOR PER LICENSE 7000-8000 PER MONTH.
3] HE SAID I WILL PERSONALLY INTRODUCE WITH THAT PERSONS.
BUT THREE MONTHS HAS PASSED AWAY I HAVENT RECEIVED ANY RECEIPT FOR THE SAME.
HE IS DEMANDING MORE AND MORE MONEY FOR LICENSES .
4} MANY TIMES HE HAVE HARASSED ME THAT I WILL INFORM CENTRAL POLICE IF U HAVE NOT GIVEN MORE MONEY .
5] FALSELY ALLEGED THAT U R DOING ILLEGAL BUSINESS AND FORGED ME AND U WILL GO TO JAIL FOR 10-15 DAYS
6] WE HAVE ALL VIOCE RECORDINGS OF THIS PERSON
PLS GIVE US LEGAL OPINION
THANKS IN ADVANCE
kingmaidas
04 July 2016 at 16:00
Hi Experts,
I am got a call on last Wednesday from a lady claiming that she is calling from Delhi high Court. And she told that there is a criminal cheating case filed against me in Delhi high court and asked me whether i know anything about this case. When i said i do not have any clue about this and She gave a lawyers number and asked me to talked to him. I called the lawyer and enquired the about this. He said he call back. Again i got a call on last friday which i could not answer from the lady who claimed to be from high court. When i called up again she said she did not call me.
When i checked the mobile number which is claimed to be from Delhi high court in Truecaller app, its showing as Taxi services. and when i checked the lawyers number in Truecaller app, its marked as SPAM.
Please suggest what i can do now. Thanks a lot in Advance.
Rakesh gupta
04 July 2016 at 14:10
I am living seperatly from my wife since 2014 she filed RCR & CRPC 125 Maint in 2015 and then now in 2016 498A,323,506,Section34 Drowy prob act.
1) Does 498A case stands after RCR ?
2) Does the maint amount varies if i say know to RCR (we yet to file Objections on RCR)
3)Shall i object RCR stating she has filed 498A on me or what is the best way to proceed
Rakesh Kumar
04 July 2016 at 14:09
After dismissal of a private complaint from Hona'ble trial court and Punjab and haryana high court at the stage of summoning a criminal SLP had filed in Hon'ble Supreme Court. The same court issued notice to the respondents and on a day when I was absent in the court due to application of adjournment at my risk passed the final judgement i.e,
"Heard
No ground for interference is made out to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petitions are dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s),if any,stands disposed of". Secondly, in the impugned order,(that was challenged in the Hon'ble Supreme Court) of Hon'ble High court a option was left that "at the most the accused persons are liable to be proceeded against departmentally".
Now my question is
1.Whether the judgement of the Hon'ble High court still stand by so that I will go for the departmental enquiry against the respondents as directed by Hon'ble High court.
2. If yes and if departmental enquiry proceeded legally wrong,biased then how can I challenge the said departmental enquiry into the court of law especially when the doors of the all courts shut down for me already in the present case?
___Raja___
04 July 2016 at 14:08
1. Our society got registered in 2010 and subsequently the society was handed over via 1st AGM in 2010 itself by the builder. Conveyance deed is pending.
2. As per the handover record, every member has got 1 parking allotment letter as per the allotment of 1 parking duly mentioned in the sale deed by the builder
3. There are more number of parking slots in the society than the number of flats.
3. Recently it came to the management committee's knowledge that few residents hold additional parking allotment letters and are now claiming to be allotted additional parking by the builder (Paid in cash of course)
4. The additional parking allotments were issued after the society was registered and formed.
We are aware of supreme court ruling and MOFA act etc. but want to understand how to apply it in the present case.
Q1 - Do the members holding additional parking have any legal claim on the parking allotment. Can society claim it back.
Q2 - Can the builder make any such allotment without the knowledge of the managing committee.
Q3 - What action can the society take against such members and the builder
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Regarding ruling in power of attorney validity
Where there are two or more principals and they are joint and several, and if one of them dies, the
agency terminates only as regards the representative of the deceased principal, but it continues as
regards the surviving principal."..in this both of civil and criminal matter ruling..need urgent help