Ipc 395, 399, 120b
Ramesh
(Querist) 18 July 2016
This query is : Resolved
1) Mr X is not present at the scene when dacoity took place ... Is IPC 395 Applicable?
2) Mr X transfered Rs 5000 through bank to one of the accused prior to the offence, but IO did not specify how is is used for offence... Is IPC 399 applicable
Plz give clarification and any judgements to support the issue..
Ramesh
(Querist) 18 July 2016
Hi.. I would like to inform that a case has been registered and is being tried, based ONLY on two facts..1) Making calls after dacoity and 2) transfer of rs 5000, prior to the offence... I was not present when dacoity took place.. I am being charged with IPC 395,399, 120b... Hence I have put the above question...
Guest
(Expert) 18 July 2016
Mr. Ramesh,
Mr.X, Mr.Y, Mr.Z, etc. makes clear that your query is an academic query. Moreover, when not being an advocate, you want judgments to support the issue or clarification by experts, confirm that the query is purely academic one.
By the way, how do you propose to use the judgments?
Also please clarify, have you been arrested or not by the police and what is the present status of the case?
Guest
(Expert) 18 July 2016
Mr. Sudhir,
It is purely an academic query.
P. Venu
(Expert) 18 July 2016
If the calls made and payments effected forms part of the common intention for the crime, then you are liable.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 21 July 2016
I agree with the experts, consult a local tutor for academic query.
