Validity of document

raj (Querist) 14 July 2016 This query is : Resolved

Marking document as exhibit
Respected EXPERTS,

in my 498a case a temple marriage certificate (EX-P2) was marked by the (PW4)Assistant Executive Officer of the temple along with his evidence deposed as he was working as AEO from about 10 years in the said temple and he issued the said attested 2nd marriage certificate to the police

but the EX -P2 certificate's attestation was showing as i/c PA to EO and the signature was completely different as seen from his examination in chief and the attestation how can i challenge this that he not signed it and he is intereted witness and its not a valid document,
My case in brief,,,,,,

Respected EXPERTS,,, A complaint was registered on A1 to A4, me father, mother, brother under 498a, 3&4dp act Allegations are my (LW1s) father gave 1 lakh Rs stridhan, after three years gave 3 lakh rs for business purpose again my husband demanded me to sell away land which is given by my father to me and bring the sale consideration, I have informed the same to my inlaws they to supported A1 if Iam not fulfill A1 Demand they will perform another marriage. To A1 with lady ppppp, on enquiry I came to know. That the parents of A1 performed marriage of A1 wth pppp on date dddd at temple tttt, my parents questioned A2 to A4 abt the 2nd marriage, they admitted and gave negligent answers and stated to do whatever we can do. Hence the case POLICE registered the case and investigated the case and recorded 161 statements of LW1 TO LW4 Relatives of LW1, LW 5 PA to EO of the temple were 2nd marriage performed, LW6 Purohith who performed the alleged marriage LW7 brother of 2nd married girl, LW 8&9 are investigating officers?,Police also filed the marriage certificate of 2nd stating duly attested by LW5 in the list of witnesses ,,, Chief and cross of LW1 to LW3 completed,,, LW 4 & LW6 Closed due to no serving of summons,,, LW5 examined in chief as PW4 and marked the marriage certificate as EX-P2, and was reopened for cross on 18th this month is the present status now,,,, Coming to the 161 Statement dated 30 June of LW5 Iam PA to EO of the said Temple on 26th June one ASI police came to our temple and said one A1 of our case has married 2 nd time without giving divorce in your temple dated 1st april, I verified the records and informed him that it was performed and gave the xerox copy of the certificate and stated him will bring the original at the time of hiscevidence,,, signed by the ASI Dated 30th june,,,,? After 9 years,,,,Examination in chief of LW5 as PW4 ,,, He stated that iam working as AEO from 10 years ago, Iam maintaining the records of the said Temple, on Monday one ASI of X place came to our temple and asked whether A1 of our case has married in your temple, I verified the records and informed him that the marriage of A1 with a lady x was performed on 1st April, I gave the 2nd marriage certificate of A1 with lady X?, EX--P2 is the attestation copy of the certificate, I was examined by the police,,,, CONTENTS OF EX-P2 DATE & TIME OF MARRIAGE ,,, DETAILS OF BRIDE & GROOM,,,, PASSPORT PHOTOS OF BRIDE & GROOM & SIGNATURES, SIGN OF Purohith(LW6) & sign of temple clerk,,, Sign of A2 & LW7,,,, CONFIRMING THE DETAILS FURNISHED ARE TRUE AND PERMISSION GRANTED TO PERFORM THE MARRIAGE IN THE TEMPLE RECEIPT NO..,.... (with corrections),,??DATED 2ND APRIL corrected as 1st April, Signature of the EO of temple was blank, bottom of the page is attested by I/C PA to EO dated 30 june, beside this sign initials were observed dated 29th June. I want to defend the EX-P2 as not valid as the attestation sign was different from the person deposed in the court

can experts give me grounds to defend and legal decissions on the admissability of the document

My contention is that no such marriage was performed by A1 ,,, A1 to A4 were examined under section 239,,, Charges framed as below ,,, FIRSTLY,,,, YOU A1 to A4 PRIOR TO THE PRESENT RESIDENCE and you A1 BEING THE HUSBAND OF LW1 SUBJUCTED TO CRUELTY AND HARASSED HER MENTALLY AND PHYSICALLY SUSPECTING HER FIDELITY AND NECKED HER OUT OF THE HOUSE?, hence 498a ,,, LASTLY YOU A1 to A4 BEAT THE LW1 HENCE 324IPC

Please request the experts as my case is in crucial stage and request for latest discussions on the marked document

Follow Query

Report Abuse