ramu (s) 31 March 2011
adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (practicing advocate) 31 March 2011
It is very easy to get AB because when the alleged offences are committed he was in austrila so produce the document and get bail for him, even he quash the FIR by filing a writ in the high court. It is better to challenge the FIR which is filed against all. It is said that 498A is legal terrorism.
aatma 31 March 2011
Ramu,
Have you ever searched what is IPC498A in the Google? If not do it now. You will find lot of information for your query. Most of the time ignorance of innocents is largely exploited by the police and judiciary in india. Don't be a victim of your ignorance!
Here I give you a startup information for your college going sister...
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr. Misc. No.24203 of 2010
NEETI RANI @ NEETI KUMARI, Daughter of Sri Ram Prabodh Sharma at present residing at House No.1386A, Sector-29, Faridabad, Haryana- 121008, whereas the ancestral house is situated in village-Mirupr, P.S. Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur .....Petitioner
Versus
1. THE STATE OF BIHAR &
2. Binita Kumari, D/o Sri Chandeshwar Prasad Singh, resident of village- Jadudharampur, P.S. Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur Opposite Parties -----------
3. 09.12.2010 Heard the parties. The petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, East Muzaffarpur, in Tr. No.2682 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No.1192 of 2009 by which he has taken cognizance under section 498-A Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The petitioner happens to be the unmarried sister-in-law of the complainant and it has been submitted and all along she was studying outside the State and, therefore, the present case is totally unwarranted.
Counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that there is allegation against her and, therefore, she should be proceeded against.
Repeatedly this court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court has been stressing on the point that meticulous examination even at the stage of cognizance and issue of summons should be done in the cases of section 498-A Indian Penal Code so that the entire family members are not embroiled in unnecessary litigation.
In view of such, this application is allowed and the order dated 14.12.2009 passed by the SDJM, East, Muzaffarpur, in Tr. No.2682 of 2009 arising out of Complaint Case No.1192 of 2009, so far as it pertains to the petitioner only, is hereby quashed. The application stands allowed.
JA/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)
Shonee Kapoor (Legal Evangelist - TRIPAKSHA) 27 December 2011
Sam,
It is an old thread and most probably the query is resolved why revive it.