A bigamist deserves the toughest punishment-supreme court

Great! and thanks for sharing:

@Princess

You are again one of the many of which @Roshni belong. You guys get swayed by bold headlines which are in favor of women and thrashes men. Now see the below line as per your own post:

Sharing its concern with a woman who was lured to marriage by a man who had concealed his subsisting marriage, the Supreme Court has ruled that he is liable to face the criminal prosecution for committing bigamy, cheating and cruelty.

Where did the Supreme Court generalized 'Bigamy'? This case has a peculiar situation that the man concealed his subsisting marriage.

There are instances where woman is ready to marry a married man on her own free will. The cases of 'Bigamy' are peculiar and not general. Please do not misguide the audience and do not create confusion!

Needless to mention, the statute applies common and same principle in case of man and woman in this section. So let's not generalize and violate the fundamental principles of criminal jurisprudence.

//peace

/Saurabh..V

Saurabh u have to protest to everything which are in favour of women.This news neither favour women and u yourself has admitted that statute bigamy is same for both man and woman.They why is this discontentment??

What do u want???To support man whatever he does??Anything that are against man are not digestable by you....in some cases men are guilty(like in this news)...

Supreme Court has not generalised bigamy, does it mean we wont read news/judgement  on this topic??

If so why did you read it?? 

Sorry Saurabh bhaiya for hurting your feelings.I did not know this news will upset you so much.

Bhaiya,you can sue this newspaper DNAindia for publishing such a misleading heading "BIGAMIST DESERVES TOUGHEST PUNISHMENT-SC".They have mislead lakhs and lakhs of people who did not read the entire news,but only this heading.Before this heading spoils the life of all such readers,please do something bhaiyaa...

I agree with you ,that people will not read the entire news,but only the heading and conclude what this news is talking about.

As far as I am concerned,mujhe maaf karo bhaisaahab.I did not decide with dnaindia,that this will be the most suitable heading for this news.I do not work for this newspaper.

I agree with you that Roshni kuch bhi post kar deti hai.Mai bhi uski nakal karti rahti hu.Par kya karu.Mai nakalchi bandariya hu naa..

In this case,the keep was unaware of the man being already married.So she cannot be called fraudulent.Rather she deserves our praises for immediately bringing this cheater to court,instead of continuing to live with him even after knowing of his marital status.

@Author & @Gaury

See the below post which has very good explanatory comments from @Utpala.

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/A-bigamist-deserves-the-toughest-punishment-supreme-court-42563.asp

Learn to think postive. If you only post news here so that you earn points and gain credits and draw attention, please stop that. If you post it to elicit members free opinion, be ready to hear positive and negative both.

A feminist is a person........ ( I M PLANNING TO MAKE A DEFINITION) ... Wait for my upcoming post on this :)

//peace

/Saurabh..V

I did not support bigamy.I replied to relevancy of Atmaa's post in that thread.He made cruelty by one spouse by getting married again equal to some specific custom of  specific region.