LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Gaurav (TL)     29 December 2010

Blackmailing - By Wives

Prabhu Deva enters into divorce deal with wife


 
Actor Prabhu Deva has entered into a divorce settlement with his wife of 15 years Ramlath alias Latha and agreed to give her three residential properties, two cars and `10 lakh in alimony. In return, Latha has agreed to relinquish all her rights and claims over the actor and his other properties and has agreed to withdraw all the cases she filed against him.

A joint affidavit, signed by the couple, was submitted in the I additional family court here on Tuesday, when they appeared together and remained closeted with presiding officer Pandurangan for a while. The settlement, which will be formalised by a court decree after a period of six months, has brought to an end a rather complicated court battle involving film stars.

It all started when Latha filed a petition in the family court seeking restitution of conjugal rights with Prabhu Deva. She alleged that the actor-director had a relationship with another actor and that he was neglecting his family and did not provide even the minimum financial assistance to family members.

In a second petition, she wanted the court to restrain Prabhu Deva and actor Nayanthara from giving joint interviews to any magazine and to restrain them from formalising their marriage.

On Tuesday, quite unexpectedly, Prabhu Deva appeared in the court along with Latha and sought divorce by mutual consent.

As per the terms of the settlement, Prabhu Deva agreed to give his wife the custody of their children, aged about eight and three, but ensured unfettered visiting rights. He shall be responsible for their education and medical expenses, and he has given his beach property at Injambakkam here to the children.

He also agreed to forego two cars — Toyota Innova and Mahindra Logan — to Latha and allowed her to retain their upmarket Anna Nagar house. She will also get two flats in Ranga Reddy district in Andhra Pradesh.

All the remaining property documents shall be returned to Prabhu Deva, the agreement said. It also said that Latha would have no rights or claims whatsoever on them.

Noting that they had serious differences of opinion and misunderstanding, Prabhu Deva and Latha, in their joint petition, said it had become "very difficult, rather impossible for them to live together or to lead a normal life".

Disclosing that they were living separately for more than two years, they said Prabhu Deva had agreed to the divorce terms "out of his own will".

Read more: Prabhu Deva enters into divorce deal with wife - The Times of India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Prabhu-Deva-enters-into-divorce-deal-with-wife/articleshow/7181695.cms#ixzz19TtPcogH


Learning

 2 Replies

Gulshan Tanwar (Advocate)     29 December 2010

Money is honey!!!

Bhaskar for SOCIAL JUSTICE (Legal & Social Activist)     29 December 2010

SAD IT IS READLY SAD ONE MORE VICTIM OF GREEDNESS OF WIFE DUE TO UNFAIR LAWS OF INDIA VERY SHAMEFUL There should be equilibrium in law and justice and its should not be gender biased. Today women is claiming ,maintenance whether they have any real problem with their husband or not but they are claiming it as a matter of right and it becomes business now to earn easy money. Marry the rich person , do quarrel with them and then claim maintenance and alimony. When she is not ready to co-operate and take care of her husband and family then why she should get any maintenance/alimony. IT MUST BE STOPPED AND BE GIVEN ONLY IN DESERVING CASES WHERE HUSBAND IS GUILTY AND WIFE IS INNOCENT.IT WILL SAVE THE FAMILIES. It is a jungle raj and way to become rich on others money. If husband has duty to maintain her wife then wife has also duty to take care of him and give love and affection. So there should be no maintenance at all for wife's who are just trying to enrich them by using this ANDHA KANOON. Certain suggestions to preserve families and to save them: • No maintenance till guilty is proved and if husband is ready to reconcile and bear all the expenses of wife and children if she re-joins him. • No maintenance and alimony in the 2nd marriage if she has got it in the first divorce. • No maintenance if she can maintain her or her parents can maintain her and if husband is ready to take her back. • Compulsory mediation for avoiding long legal battle. • Law should be such that both husband and wife try to reconcile . • Law should not be favoring anyone to ensure that marriages are saved. Domestic violence complaint / fir should be filed within 24 hours of alleged incidence in place of today's situation in which wife and her parents try to black mail the husband and his family to agree to their terms and if they do not agree then they file case even after many years. DV Act must be applicable equally to men and women as today women is more aggressive and ill-treat, abuse, beat husbands and in-laws but the DV Act not applicable to them. It must cover wife's and their families to ensure equality and justice. Limits provided in the Act for filing mutual consent Divorce after 1 year separation, desertion of 2 year,3 years for IRBM etc. should be removed and it should be only 3 months so both can start their life’s afresh. When two persons can marry without any waiting period then there should be no waiting period for separation. The most important thing is to fix time limit for completion of hearing and disposal of case in any court say 6 months only. The cases must be tried on fast track basis. The infrastructure of the legislative system should be strenght4ened and cases must be disposed off within 6 months. For filing cases some minimum requirement of proofs etc. must be there and it should not be like this that for any small small issue anybody can go and file the case. Specially for family matters pre-litigation mediation must be compulsory and the behavior/flexibility of each party in resolving the issue must be recorded and should be base of their case in future (if any). Pre-neputal agreement should be made legal so husband and wife are aware before hand what they are going to get or loose if they part there ways and they should be allowed to take divorce on the terms mentioned in the agreement without going to court. MAXIMUM LIMIT OF MAINTENANCE AMOUNT BE FIXED IN THE ACT ITSELF TO STOP ITS MIS-USE THERE MUST BE STRICT PENAL PROVISIONS FOR PETITIONER AND ADVOCATES FOR FILING FALSE CASES.IT WILL REDUCE LARGE NUMBER OF FALSE CASES. AS PER STATATICS 95% DOWRY/ DOMESTIC VIOLANCE CASES ARE FALSE.ONCE JUDGES START PUNISHING THOSE INVOLVED IN SUCH CASES THERE WILL BE SEA CHANGE. Dowry law, Hindu Marriage law, Domestic violence Act etc. must be made equal for both husband and wife. Lacs of husband are suiciding because of these biased laws. FILE REPRESENTATION BEFORE COMMITTE OF PETITIONS OF RAJYA SABHA FOR CHANGE OF 498a TO STOP ITS MISUSE BEFORE 30.12.2010 If husband has a duty to maintain his wife then he must have some rights also and if wife has right of maintenance then she must have some duties also. The government of India who has enacted this type of illogical law has on its own part giving this type of maintenance/allowance etc. to citizens of India if they don’t have any earning/job etc. NO not at all. In NAREGA they are just giving guarantee of work for 100 days and wages for the days worked so this should also be applicable to husband and wife also. This blackmailing by wife's must be stopped forthwith.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register