I saw an interesting scenario where the Respondent filed vakalat but didn't include the counter filing along with the vakalat. when Petitioner queried the Judge as vakalat was handed through Judge, he said lawyers are on strike so am handing it to you and in next hearing u'll receive the counter. In the next hearing Judge is on leave and when queried it is stated as he is retired and the court hearing doesn't happen for 7 months. New Judge came and has made it as Ex-parte stating counter has not been filed. It seems very fishy to me. So can any one explain this.