Dear sir

As you mentioned

"Utilize every opportunity to go to higher courts before the final verdict and not after to press for your pleas."

In what circumstances i can go to higher court before final verdict . Please explain.

Dear JSDN After 138 NI Act, 1988 amendments, cases are getting piled up as heap with no solution, you are on the other side of the table others are not interested to make suitable norms for public? since the issuer is not worried from courts, what action can be taken maxm is not to fear? hence

YES DEAR YOU ARE RIGHT INDIANS/HINDU/ALL IS ALWAYS IN SLEEP?

YES  AGREE  WITH  YOU.

*PARL   PASSES  BILL WITH OUT READING, EVEN, SINCE "Q" IS PAYMENT OF FOR ASKING , /

NOT TO ASK, /OR & TO KEEP "QUITE" .

ALL THREE MONEY- DIEMENSTIONS ARE LEVELED NOW, IS SEEN ACCURATELY , APPROPREATELY. SINCE MEDIA IS LITTLE  BIT TO SHOW SOME TIMES  TO PUBLIC MANY TIME,  WHO DO NOT HAVE TELEVISIONS?

HOPE MANY WILL  AGREEE  WITH  MY  VIEWS.

THE IMERGENCE OF -RAM DEV BABA, / OR ANNA HAZARE,  CIVIL SOC. TEAM IS THE FALIURE OF DEMOCRACY, OPP PARTIES, OTHERS ALONG WITH THE SELF CENTERED BENEFITS AND INTEREST TO THEM SLEVES. THAT IS WHY THE SALALRY BILL GET PASSED WITH OUT ANY HASSLES BY ALL APRTIES ?     IS IT DEMOCRACY  

sir,

in a  reccently  case  complaintant  state in court that  he give money against chaque and he paid by in him accout of saving account,  but he produce in court  a manager of bank and statement of current acoount with entry of the money.

when advocate of accused produce a application for statement of saving acount then trail court is refused.

WHAT ACTION WILL DO BY ACCUSED ADVOCATE?

PLEASE   ADVISE.

NATWAR RAJ PUROHIT

REDDY  AND  JSDN  SIR,

A  LOT OF THANKS.

AS PER YOUR ADVISE  ALSO,  THE  ACCUSED  ADVOCATE  FILED  REVISION  IN HIGH COURT.

DECISION IN FAVOUR  TO   ACCUSED IN FIRST  HEARING.

Dear All Experts,

On going thro' some of citations judgement, anad views,

Hold a suggession with your feed back-

can lawyers from law club-

 take up this issue from legal angle with social disbursment of responsibility pls,  [if so what could be suggessions] - 

1- to reduce the load for courts, un block funds, give it to main stream of the people's life,

2- simply admissions to upper court is not to be permitted, u/s 482, 498 etc , then linger on sysytem? till die?

3- time limits is a must and compulsory factor,  from judiciary even?

4- number of application must not be end-less-  should not be more than three.

5- punishment to both side is compulsory, wrong complaint not excused.

6-fear of judiciary ? if not there no point in discussions  * * [ strict law, implementation, observations] is must, but corruption free is first base- honesty can not be imported from other country?  [ ex law minister said - 16 R Corrupt out of 20?] many more?

7- judiciary even can not be permitted to use tax payers funds, money for terrorist play/ers, no advocate should place his unfair vaklatmnama for such people.  kasab is still surviving/pls. 

8- higher the people, level, high the punishment [ if 2 G is to be dealt with a normal punishment who wud not like to eat the free cakes?     [ you cant hv same law for a bread vada hunger stiller with 2g scam creator , no eaquality] , even other must be punished, keep silence and broke out when asked by Supreme court is not the justice,?

9- I am trying hard to generate funds for to support all genuine cases, from some NGO grups with funds of Rs10-20 lacs and to be re-circulated. your suggessions are wel-come please.

 

10- Gen people are fed-up of judicairy system, is 

   beyond reach, over reach and above reach,

if said is nothing wrong but an alarming sound for hearing people ? 

1-

in a cheque bouncing case- 

1- Rfr jc MR. Arijit pasayat & P Sadshivam JJ JDMNT-

    N Ranga chari v/s B.S.N.L-? 592/2005

is any other judgment which makes the people to up hold the Social responsibility better ;

even then what is the "Quantum" of Punishment?

"Bare Act stated the Double the Amount with 6 months Imprisonment? ,/ but same magistrate will give bail?

is it not a point of Corruption input thereat?

Pls put Focus & express views ?

 Hw its' justified with Complaint / Complainant ?