constructive possession???

Your suit itself is not maintainable.  Court cannot grant TI order against the land lord.  If it could have been challenged the TI order would have been vacated by appellentte court already.

Your suit itself is wrong.  You could have filed a suit like this "  Defendant may kindly be restrained permanently by vacating the tenent without following the due process of law"

Sir, as fas i know the civil court order prevail over the ordr of Executive Magistrate. In your cae as u first approach the civil court the order by executive magistrate can be nulified or set aside. Kindly check u r pryer portion in the suit. the executive magistrate can only decide the question relating to possession and he can not decide the relating to title, but in u r case u have already admittd the tenancy. So place ur case accordingly.

I think either rajoo didn't understand my queries or he replied post in a hurry. 

Why the Court can not grant TI to a tenant against Landlord??

Obviously court give the relief "with due process of law""

It doesn't matter to my query.  Plz look deeply and answer the queries.

further i Thank GURU for his efforts.

but plz refer any judgement here..

The two provisions are distinct as section 145 and 146 are to control the breach of peace and as pointed out by Guru the rights of the parties will be dtermined by the Civil court.

The suit is proper and maintainable. It seems 145 is initiated after the injunction order.The attachment order is obtained by suppressing facts of Stay by Civil Court and any such order will have no effect on your injunction application.