LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     03 October 2012

Consultation paper-cum-questionnaire regarding section 498-a

3 Oct 2012 Hindustan Times (Delhi) Nagendar Sharma nagendar.sharma@hindustantimes.com


Law panel wants anti-dowry law toned down


The government’s expert panel on legal issues has recommended a change in the criminal law to prevent the immediate arrest of husbands and their family members against whom police complaints are filed by their wives under the anti-dowry law.


The Law Commission of India, in its latest report, has asked the government to water the anti-dowry law down to allow a woman to withdraw her complaint if a compromise with her husband and his family is possible. The law panel also wants to make it a compoundable offence but with a court’s permission.


The Supreme court had asked the law commission to give its findings on whether section 498A of the IPC and enabling laws, which deal with physical and mental cruelty by husbands and their relatives against wives over dowry, require amendments following several reports of their misuse.


It has sought an amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) in an attempt to introduce a 30-day “reconciliation” period before the police can arrest an accused under the anti-dowry law.
“The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest in the context of cases under section 498A the IPC has been emphasised by courts and parliamentary committees time and again,” the report states.


“We, therefore, suggest that a new clause may be added to the CrPC section 41 to make clear that whenever a complaint of physical and mental cruelty is filed by a married woman, a police officer shall set in motion a process of reconciliation between the two parties before he or she resorts to the power of arrest,” the commission has recommended.


This 30-day period, however, will not apply if an investigating officer feels that “facts disclose an aggravated form of cruelty” and the arrest of an accused is necessary, it points out.


The panel has, however, rejected the demands for either recommending a complete repeal of the anti-dowry law or making it a bailable offence. “Misuse by itself cannot be a ground to take away its teeth … We can’t close our eyes to a large number of cases which go unprosecuted,” it stated.


See also PDF annexure and voice your views accordingly.



Learning

 1 Replies

stanley (Freedom)     05 October 2012

 

under cruelty to husband you can see

762,425 cases registers

643,820 are pending

100,453 completed

 

Convicted to Trials completed was 21%

Convited to Total Trials 2.7%

 

with the above ratios it should be made bailable .  The metro women use these laws for filing false cases rather than the women staying in rural areas who really suffer from this. The mind set of the people in metro areas have changed nowdays as both spouses work and are self sufficient and the concept of harassment for dowry is negligible in metro areas rather it exists in rural areas and its the rural women who suffer and they are ingorant of this law .The burden on courts would come down . vitamen M compromises would lessen as this law would have no teeth . And as a matter of fact as per law a person has to be given a trial of being heard rather than what power has been given as of date to the police to first arrest the person under this section . This freedom of the police should be curtailed and only with the permission of the magistrate arrest  should take place that too after undergoing a trial .

 

I read an artilce elsewhere where lawyers have stated it should not be made bailable . Its but natural their source of vitamin M would come down . Fewer cases would be filed as vengence would not take place of filing false cases to bring the person to a settlement with a compromise of vitamin M . Religious institution's  of the respective faiths,retired aged  qualified people in this particular field  should take up recoincilation and  counselling . A amicable settlement should be tried out .The Dv act talks about shelter homes for rural people its nothing but a joke as i have not even seen a list of shelter homes in such rural areas and in india i can imagine even if these homes are set up the pathetic condition of it . 


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register