MARRIAGE ARE DECIDED IN HEAVEN
Many of said MARRIAGE ARE DECIDED IN HEAVEN
Now my question is Live in relation are decided in ?
MARRIAGE ARE DECIDED IN HEAVEN
Many of said MARRIAGE ARE DECIDED IN HEAVEN
Now my question is Live in relation are decided in ?
Suchitra. S (Advocate) 25 October 2010
They are not decided cases. There the order is to maintain the status quo. :D
adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) (practicing advocate) 25 October 2010
Nice answer by Suchitra.
live in relation is just like leave and license.
G. ARAVINTHAN (Legal Consultant / Solicitor) 25 October 2010
when i put this to my friend. He said "Though marriages are decided in heavens, they are performed in earth and executed in hells"
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate (Advocacy) 25 October 2010
HELL
Roshni B.. (For justice and dignity) 25 October 2010
live in relationship is decided in lunatic brains
Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 25 October 2010
"Though marriages are decided in heavens, they are performed in earth and executed in hells"
DEAR ARVINTHAN,
THANKS TO YOUR FRIEND.
HE EXPRESSED THE MATTER VERY PERFECTLY VERY SPECIFICALLY BY THE WORDS - executed in hells.
Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 25 October 2010
live in relationship is decided in lunatic brains
A LUNATIC PATIENT ALWAYS FEEL THAT, HE / SHE SOURANDED BY LUNATICS, EXCEPT HE / SHE IS.
Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 25 October 2010
HEAVEN AND HELL BOTH ARE SITUATED IN THIS MATERIAL WORLD.
LIVE IN IS THE OLDEST FORM OF MARRIAGE.
Roshni B.. (For justice and dignity) 25 October 2010
sati is also the oldest custom...so it shud also be practised fully if we go by your argument arup jee
Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 25 October 2010
SATI CUSTOM INTRODUCED BY SOME HINDU FUNDAMENTALIST. NOW THEY WASHED OUT.
ALL OLD IS NOT GOLD.
SOME ARE TIMETESTED AND IF SOCIETY NEEDS IT WILL CONTINUE.
LIVE IN IS ONE OF THEM.
Adv.Vinita (Advocate) 25 October 2010
Yes, Its true that Marriages are Heaven,so if Live in Relationship decided to get married on earth after spending some time together , want to live together for whole life then the conclusion is their mariage is decided there.
Roshni B.. (For justice and dignity) 25 October 2010
i'm talking about live in b/w married persons or b/w 1 married and 1 unmarried person which leads to suffering of the spouse of adulterous partner.such adulterous people are sick according to me.
if 2 unmarried people live in for some time to check their compatibility status,it's their personal choice.
There is something said in Hindi, I do not know how to translate it, that;
"Kaua (Crow) kaan le ke bhaag gaya.. And people just run behind the crow (without checking the own ear first)"
So first we should think that; Is it true that Marriages are decided in heaven or otherwise?
Is it decided in heaven that the woman after marriage will make food for husband and wash the dishes & his cloths and sweep the house and follow his orders like orderly? All the married couples are happy? No divorce cases are filed by those whose marriages were decided in heaven?
No. So marriages also not decided in heaven.
In live in relation none of them want responsibility of other so woman in better position than the marriage.
Since they don't want responsibility so no question of children.
Those who feel need of children they have to be prepared to shoulder responsibility in all aspects and so they have to marry to secure the rights of the child.
If man will not understand that woman are equal human being live in relation will ever increase and marriages will be reduced.
All this are decided here on earth only so live with ground facts.
Parthasarathy (Business) 25 October 2010
Historically, marriage is socially accepted form of prostitution.
Thats where the MAN takes care of a woman - giving her all creature comforts he is capable off, in turn making sure she does not visit other eligible males, and ensuring the children are his. Obviously, to do this HAD TO BE wealthier than the woman.
When you accept this history, marriage is failing because the one does not keep with her part of the unwritten contract. New 'unwritten' rules of the feminists, are taking the place of accepted social norms.
The romanticisation of marriage is pure media stereotype. Forming anti-male associations and groups, are giving the gender unfair advantage.
The use - or abuse - of a word, is a DIVERSIONARY TACTIC employed by rhe anti-male ASG, who LOST her case to get MONEY for broken relationships extended to 'live-in' relations.
MONEY as a basis for ANY relationship - whether broken or ongoing, is BAD for the relationship itself, since the lure of MONEY can break any relation.
'ALIMONY' is anti-male, and is against the fundamental rights of men.
MONEY is the HEART of the issue that attention is sought to be diverted from.
For ANTI-MALES, "keep" is s*xist, and "Wife" is patriarchal!
What would they want to ban NEXT? 'Histrionic' perhaps?
WAKE UP, MALES! SPEAK UP!