Sarveshwar Mehrotra (Practising Lawyer) 14 December 2008
Prakash Yedhula (Lawyer) 14 December 2008
Where cheques issued as security, on dishonour of such cheque, not offence under Sec.138 of the Act (2001 (2) RCR (Crl.) 75 MP) also see 2002 (3) Crimes 145 ( Raj).
Sunny Honey (Student) 14 December 2008
Thankx sir, very useful information. Sir can u please cite the name of the case as well, accompanied by the number and year of judgement of the appropriate jurisdictional high court or that of Supreme Court. URGENT REPLY REQUIRED.
Regards,
GUEST
Sarveshwar Mehrotra (Practising Lawyer) 14 December 2008
Thank you sir
RAKHI BUDHIRAJA ADVOCATE (LAWYER AT BUDHIRAJA & ASSOCIATES SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) 24 December 2008
thanx a lot sir
Kamal Grover (Advocate High Court Chandigarh M:09814110005 email:adv.kamal.grover@gmail.com) 18 November 2009
There are various latest judgments also of supreme court that cheque issued as security did not attract provisions of 138. But ur counsel have to search the same.
Regards
adv.kamal.grover@gmail.com
Jais Kumar (Director) 20 November 2009
There are various latest judgments of supreme court that cheque issued as security did not attract provisions of 138. Can any one please help me in searching the same.
Hemant Narayan Gokhale (Advocate) 08 December 2009
U/S.138 Negotiable Instrument Act itself stated that cheque issued only for discharge of liability.