This is about family court/a district court status.
What may happen if a litigant makes a grievience/Complaint 2 same court about his bias/prejudice. in a written memo?
What may happen if a litigant makes a grievience/Complaint 2 same court about his (same court's) bias/prejudice in writing?
And tells court that I have apprehensions about fair trial?
Is 'same court' ought to take cognizance of this complaint as per principles of natural justice? especially if I narrate all the facts on the case in writing? ... OR .. Does this above become a 'contempt of court'?
Both sides should get chance to be heard... and if one side says court is behaving in prejudiced manner and that has scared me and hence am very afraid and scared and reluctant to put my case and feeling pressuried!! And all this is hampering the 'process of justice'.
And in the same 'memo ot grievience' if the litigant narrates ...
A) the concrete instances of abuse of discretion by the same district court
B) and deviation from laid out procedure which resulted to favour the opposite party.
C) bias/partiality reflecting through the overlall circumstances, how case progressing (rather not progressing at all)
D) how the pile of apps by me but not getting any attention of court and subtle fashion how hurdles are created.
E) there is clear differential of treatment given (concrete instances there)
And thus can I ask the court to take cognizance that 'I no longer have the faith in court and it has been shaken and the apprehensoins are not erasable.