Accused had sold land but supressed land and shown some unrelated land and cheated
PW1 aged at 63years had clearly stated in her chief examination that Police examine me and recorded my statement and she is illiterate. However, during cross-examination, the Advocate for the Accused confused and misled PW1 by showing her some documents without reading them aloud or explaining the contents and following inaccurate and misleading statement recorded:
"I do not know what are the content of Ex.P1.I am unable to remember whether I mention in Ex.P1 in respect of the accused threatened us dire consequences when I approached the panchayat elders. I do not know whether I mentioned in Ex.P1 the accused told me that our house plot is located in different place. I unable to say whether the police examine me and recorded my statement after lodging of Ex.P1.Police did not call me and accompanied me, conducted inquiry Infront the house of raj(Accused name)"
Query: Do I need to go to appeal or high court to rexross examination of PW1 and do I need to explain the same as part of written arguments
