LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     01 September 2012

Discrimination in supreme court judgment

Avishek Goenka & Ors vs Union Of India

26. The manufacturer of the vehicle may manufacture the vehicles with tinted glasses which have Visual Light Transmission (VLT) of safety glasses windscreen (front and rear) as 70 per cent VLT and side glasses as 40 per cent VLT, respectively. No black film or any other material can be pasted on the windscreens and side glasses of a vehicle.

27. For the reasons afore-stated, we prohibit the use of black films of any VLT percentage or any other material upon the safety glasses, windscreens (front and rear) and side glasses of all vehicles throughout the country.

Reading the operative part of the Hon’ble Supreme Court Judgment, it clear that there is discrimination as between VLT glasses manufacturer with that of VLT black films manufacturer. Why?



Learning

 1 Replies

Democratic Indian (n/a)     01 September 2012

Very good point. It is clear discrimination between VLT glass manufacturers and VLT film manufacturers and thus equality before law has been violated.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register