Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 _ Section 138, 142 _ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 _ Section 204, 482 _ Dishonour of cheque _ Death of drawer _ Issuance of process against legal heirs _ Legality of.
Dishonour of cheque issued by one Hiralal _ Notice returned with an endorsement that Hiralal had expired _ Complaint alleging offence u/s 138 cannot be filed against the legal representatives of the person who had issued the cheque _ Process issued by the Magistrate against the applicants were without jurisdiction and abuse of the process of Court _ Considering absolutely untenable prosecution was launched by non-applicant no.1 the Applicants are awarded compensation of Rs.5000/-. (See para 4, 5, 7)
Held : a) "Upon the admitted facts which are stated above it is clear that filing of the complaint by the non-applicant no.1 as well as issuance of the process by the Magistrate is nothing but abuse of the process of the Court. On a plain reading of Section 138 of the Negotiable of Instruments Act it is clear that the proceedings under the complaint alleging offence under section 138 of the Act cannot be filed against the legal representatives of the person who had issued the cheque." (Para 4).
b) "Needless to mention that the issuance of the process in Criminal Case against the accused is a serious matter touching the liberty of the person against whom the offence is alleged." (Para 4).
c) "In view of the above discussion, I hold that the Criminal Case filed by the non-applicant no.1 and the process issued by the Magistrate against the applicants were without jurisdiction and abuse of the process of the court. Therefore, the proceedings in Criminal Complaint Case No.2109/2004 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Gondia and the process issued by the Magistrate are quashed." (Para 5).
Result : Application allowed.
Savita wd/o Hiralal Sorle & ors. Vs. Rajesh Damodar Sarode & anr. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1597 OF 2005 (23-2-2006) (NAGPUR BENCH) (A.P. LAVANDE, J.) (Reported in 2006 (6) LJSOFT 84)