Do not vote for any party candidate - support independents

WHIP ISSUED UNDER THE ABOVE LAW.

ACTUALLY, THAT LAW CAME INTO EXISTANCE TO CONTROL AAYARAM AND GAYARAM MP/MLAS.

I keep RESERVE the answer to point no.4 LIKE NOW IT HAS BECOME FASHION OF THE COURTS TO KEEP THE JUDGEMENT RESERVE. 

The principle is Honest always stand alone, and dishonest either remain in group or will form a group.

IF A DISHONEST PERSON STANDS ALONE,THEN SHOULD WE CONSIDER HIM AN HONEST PERSON?

THE MAIN THINGH IS -

WHAT IS THE POLICY?

AND

WHETHER THE DECLEARED POLICY FOLLOWED BY THE PERSON OR NOT?

WHAT WAS HIS PAST TRACK RECORD?

What's about the Horse Trading thereafter the election?

WE DO'NT HAVE ANY POSITIVE ANSWER OF IT,

TILL WE GET A POWER TO RETURN BACK THE MP / MLA S.

Who is restricting to honests for not to be united???  We are making loud sound to welcome all honests to be united and the DRF is open for all since it is not a pocket organisation but just it is example here out of 87000 lci member how many responding???  You please say that "The corrupt politicians and bureaucrats are restricting us to come together"...

We are trying to bring all like minded lci member to have a joint meeting on common issues but none is interested.  You please say that "The corrupt politicians and bureaucrats are restricting us to come together"...

Please say that we are breathing since The corrupt politicians and bureaucrats are saying us to breath"...

Very good idea to remain out of "RULE OFPEOPLE"..

What will Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar write the democratic constitutionif the people are not willing to read it ?????????????????????

In this regard, the independent has nothing to have dictation from anyone subject to people should observ their activites and that whether the property shown by them is increasing where and how and in case any doubt the people should make complaints. 

THE TRACK RECORDS OF INDEPENDENT IS WORSE THAN THE PARTY CANDIDATE.

AS A THEORY I AGREED WITH YOU.

THE PRACTICE FOLLOWED BY INDEPENDENTS -  WE OBSERVED LAST THIRTY YEARS NOT VERY FAIR.

AM NOT TELLING ABOUT ALL BUT SOME OF THEM ARE NOT FAIR.

"PATE KI NAHI THI?"

DIFFICULT TO ANSWER.

BUT MOST OF YOUR COMMENTS, I FOUND MYSELF IN LINE WITH YOU.

Constant watch and regular legal action by the people is the answer.

It is the objective of DRF.

Who is restricting to honests?

MOST OF THE TIMES WE ARE HONEST, BUT SOMETIMES DRIFTED FROM IT.

PLEASE TAKE IT AS A GENERAL COMMENT.

objective of DRF.

SOLELY AGREED WITH YOU.

“DIFFICULT TO ANSWER”

Arup ji, WOW !! You would be the successful politician…

I see your point.

But ultimately they dont get elected and we suffer in the long run.

 federal employment attorney

federal employment lawyers