Electoral roll cannot prove that lady lawfully wedded to man

An extract in the Electoral Roll cannot be proof of the fact that the 1st opponent was the lawfully wedded husband of the 1st petitioner. The 1st petitioner has also relied upon a photograph Exhibit 36 which is the photograph of the 1st petitioner and the 1st opponent, taken some years ago. Now this photograph has been admitted in evidence through the 1st petitioner. However, before a photograph could be admitted in evidence it is necessary that the person who took the photograph should be examined and such a person should produce the negative and no positive print or enlargement could be admitted in evidence without the negative being produced in the first instance.
Bombay High Court