Employee dismissal individual case:workplace victimization

Did he really leave HQ without permission?

One Mr. Kundra,who according to above declaration,(consequent to second appeal orders of Central Information Commission) himself leaves headquarters during every weekend,put his signature to dismissal orders .

The enquiry officer has concluded that headquarters was left to obtain stay orders from High Court Jaipur however the complete enquiry report is neither sent to the affected employee nor submitted as annexure to the High Court on behalf of insurance company.

Did Mr Gopal Soni really leave HQ without permission?

 

                       It is clearly written that intention was to get High court stay against so called transfer orders.

So  Mr Gopal Soni really left HQ without permission

 

a clear misconduct

The enquiry officer never allowed any cross examination in respect of any charge.

There is no record including court proceeding  in respect of charge of leaving headquarters.

While initially applying for leave an intimation of leaving headquarters was submitted . which is part of full enquiry report,the same is deliberately suppressed on behalf of insurance company.

The eqniry officer is a disciplined member of an association whose office secretary is a well known bribe taker.

There is no serious action on behalf of insurance company against the bribe taker association leader even after one decade of his being caught by ACB

The main witness,that is,ex-divisional manager ajmer (who alleged that headquarter was left

but has never been subjected to any cross examaination) is himself a disciplined member of association that is led by well known corrupt official of insurance company.

You have to meet somewith well versed indisciplinary matters with all the papers.

 

The matter is so deep that no useful advise can be expcted here in open forum

 

So far you hve despite multiple blogging not been able to describe your problem.

 

 

The bribe taking incident has been overtly or covertly supported in the insurance comapmy owned by Govt of India

the alleged bribe taker caught red handed was never put under suspension for a single day

consequent to consistent RTI applications the senior most official in the above news ,namely one Mr. Yadav was merely transferred near to his native place delhi

 

As per the attachment, gathered from the record of anti corruption bureau,Mrs. Kamlesh Vashisht, the then regional manager,Jaipir of the insurance company ,the competent authority to dismiss a subordinate official expressed her helpnessness by way of a speanking statement of  december 2005 before the anti corruption bureau that because of non approval from the  "Head Office" she was unable to "remove" the alleged corrupt official.

The senior most authority of Head Office, One A. R. Sekar was actually seen in the company of alleged bribe taker official as on 20 July 2012

 

I advised you

 

"You have to meet somewith well versed indisciplinary matters with all the papers.

  The matter is so deep that no useful advise can be expcted here in open forum

  So far you hve despite multiple blogging not been able to describe your problem."

now you are posting copy of newspaper cutting which doe snot at all seems relevance to the case. *or not explained as relevant by you.

 

the problem with you and Mr Gopal Soni is not legal it is psychiatric. 

 

Both of you have high opinion about you being a big martyr and you think that every member of this forum has a duty to know (or atleast himself search) for the facts of your case and then give you some advise.

No expert here meets you IQ and you remained unanswered despite multiple queries

It is settled law that disciplinary authority cannot be delegated.Relevant decision of High Court is attached.

een this newpaper report severaltimes

 

Why you cannot understand that none can be helped unless he is able to explain his query.

 

You and Mr Gopal Soni could get no advise from this forum despite series of queries and threads. Why?

 

Because you do not explain your problem.

Because you feel that you are so big a martyr that each member of this forum has got a duty to know facts leading to your so called harassement

 

If you make queries on this forum for query sake then it is OK you can keep wasting your time.

 

But if you have a very high IQ (which does not seem to be helping you) and want a real advise then   you could put facts in a manner that ordinary IQ person could understand and give you some advise

Registered post: Representation : Stop abuse of public resources Mr. G. Srinivasan (CMD by name) 24 February 2015 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd, (NIACL) 87, M.G. Road,Fort, Mumbai-400001. Dear Sir, With reference to the above the complainant (a Hindi Translator who served w.e.f. 24.02.1988 under the impression that NIACL being a PSU reasonably followed Government of India’s acts,i.e. transparency and honesty in public life,with basic insurance principle of utmost good faith) bring to the kind attention of highest decision making authority of NIACL that the following acts have been systematically committed on behalf of NIACL: 1. Hiring advocates to bend laws:- During 2007 an NIACL divisional manager who was indeed a member of such an association whose office secretary is well known to be one of doubtful integrity with NIACL salary no. 26019 hired advocate to deny mediclaim of a petty amount to honest complainant , the claim was less than about 10% of monthly salary of complainant ,it is still pending since last about 8 years.. since then hiring advocates to justify abuse is a legacy. Year Advocate from purpose 2007-2008 Ajmer Hired for somehow deny mediclaim and deny extended leave that was sanctioned. 2009 Jaipur Hired for legalizing dismissal of honest whistle blower on a “grave” charge of leaving headquarter . 2012 Jaipur Hired to render the labour law, a welfare legislation nullity. 2013 Bombay Hired for preventing the Right to Information of honest citizen of India 2. Abuse of Chief Vigilance Officer:- That Central Vigilance Commission took cognizance of whistle blowing of the complainant and issued letter dated 29.04.2008 to NIACL with directions “to ensure that no harassment is caused to complainant in any manner”. However consequent to that the honest complainant was deliberately forced to face more than one farce of domestic enquiries the same day by by one Ashok Samaria, (a member of the association whose office bearer is a well known bribe taker NIACL salary no. 26019) and eventually was dismissed,as complainant’s leave was denied by the then office incharge of Ajmer NIACL,a member of the association whose office secretary has history of being trapped by anti corruption bureau demanding bribe. A Letter dated 19th January 2009 reference No. HO/Vig/2009/CF No. 5387/ 123 issued by the then CVO of NIACL consisted of fallacies instead of facts. https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Abuse-of-chief-vigilance-officer-80167.asp 3. Corporate legacy of spreading hatred :- It is prolonged corporat tactis to spread hatred against an honest citizen of India. "A perusal of the Appeals ...filed by the Appellant to the undersigned against his 109 no. of applications under RTI submitted by him to his Employer / Committee of Parliament on Official Language / Ministry of Finance ,Central Vigilance Commission etc. it is noted that the appellant ..His umpteen applications are ..designed no to elicit information ..but to cause discomfort to the authorities concerned for having initiated disciplinary proceedings against him...” reference:- Appeal No. 029/2009 Dated 25th June 2009 RTI application dt.16.03.2009 4. False statements by public servants of NIACL :- To cause dismissal of honest complainant in the garb of so called domestic inquiry the following statement was made by one ex-colleague of well known alleged bribe taker of NIACL salary no. 26019:- "Mr. Soni used to report me for legal and Hindi department,he used to pollute the atmoshphere by not working during office time.He often used bilingual and non parliamentary language and called officers as thieves saying CRM to SDM all are corrupt. He himself was involved in scam worth millions..." 5. Rendering the labour law a nullity:- e.g. Since 3.11.2011 a reference of the industrial dispute is pending for adjudication with the Central Govt Industrial Tribunal,competent lawful authority,it was advised by the appropriate authority of Govt of India that dispute be adjudicated within 3 months,nothing has happened in 3years except stay orders obtained by way of false statement under oath by an artificial person. 6. Influencing the authority without mandate :- E.g. During 2010-2013 those in the Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) New india Assurance company head office mumbai deliberately misread the notice(s) of the Central Information Commission (with copy to appellants ,e.g. the complainant) to attend video conference. The complainant witnessed systematic loss of public money of approx. Rs. 10000/- to 25000/- per person to claim habitual ,uncalled for Delhi tour to embezzle public money .. 7. Systematic protection of doubtful integrity leaders :- e.g.It was assured to anti corruption bureau on 7.12.2005 by way of a self speaking statement (by Kamlesh Vashisht the then Chief Regional Manager at Jaipur )that an alleged bribe taker trapped while extorting bribe during January 2003 shall be “removed”,the NIACL salary No. 26019 was actually seen with Mr. A. R. Sekar,the then Chairman,NIACL as on 20.07.2012,he enjoys protection till date. It is pertinent to remind you that as per the law commission of India’s 126th report a PSU ought not to adopt a litigious attitude, I sincerely hope that stern action,under intimation to complainant is taken in the matter of abuse of NIACL,a PSU’s resources. The PSU may provide protection to an honest whistle blower,who consistently exposes abuse of public money since 2007 https://twitter.com/revribhav

hy you cannot understand that none can be helped unless he is able to explain his query.

 

You and Mr Gopal Soni could get no advise from this forum despite series of queries and threads. Why?

 

Because you do not explain your problem.

Because you feel that you are so big a martyr that each member of this forum has got a duty to know facts leading to your so called harassement

 

If you make queries on this forum for query sake then it is OK you can keep wasting your time.

 

But if you have a very high IQ (which does not seem to be helping you) and want a real advise then   you could put facts in a manner that ordinary IQ person could understand and give you some advise

There are one sided laws of discipline to victimise and isolate an honest public servant,the authorities that are expected to interfere ,to protect a citizen's fundamental rights,are overburdened to such an extent that a sitting judge of Rajasthan High Court admitted 300 minutes time is accorded to hear 300 cases. It is indeed ironic that writ petitions are being filed in the reverse manner,an agency of state files writ petitions to deny fundamental rights to a citizen..