LCI Learning
Master the Basics of Legal Drafting in All Courts. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

VINAYAGAMPILLAI K (Awaiting Advocate enrolment)     22 March 2025

Enrolment delayed for over 1 1/2 years by the bctnpy. pray for your kind support please.

Title: BCTNPY Unjustly Delays Enrolment for 1.5+ Years Despite Supreme Court & High Court Precedents

Post Content:

I have been waiting for my enrolment with BCTNPY for over 1.5 years, despite fulfilling all legal requirements. Despite submitting 23 authoritative precedents (including Supreme Court rulings), my enrolment remains in limbo!

🔹 5 appeals to BCTNPY & BCI—No response!
🔹 Judicial precedents ignored, violating fundamental rights.
🔹 March 21, 2025, Supreme Court ruling (BCI v. State of Kerala, Diary No. 11532 of 2025) clearly states that BCI has no business interfering in legal education.

BCTNPY is defying binding legal precedents, including:
✅ Sri Shelhan v. Karnataka State Bar Council (2024 KHC 3845) – Bar Councils cannot deny enrolment to LL.B. graduates with valid degrees.
✅ P. Raji v. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu (2018 (5) MLJ 621) – Enrolment delays beyond 3 months violate fundamental rights.
✅ K. Ravi v. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu (2020 (4) MLJ 677) – Retired government servants with valid LL.B. degrees must be enrolled.

âš– Justice delayed is justice denied! Can the legal community help me challenge this prolonged injustice?



 7 Replies

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     22 March 2025

While the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Puducherry (BCTNPY) aims for expeditious processing, delays in enrolment applications can occur, but should not be "inordinate" and should be dealt with within a reasonable timeframe, generally not exceeding three months, with potential extensions for exceptional circumstances.

You can move high court with a writ petition against the bar council seeking appropriate directions by citing the judgments in your possesion  along with all documentary evidnces to support your claim.

Dr. J C Vashista (Advocate )     23 March 2025

Very well advised by learned senior expert, I agree.

It is advised to avoid posting local abbreviations in legal parlance, such as BCTNPY used by you.

 .

VINAYAGAMPILLAI K (Awaiting Advocate enrolment)     23 March 2025

Thank you for your kind response. I have already cited 22 authoritative case laws, including Supreme Court and High Court judgments, supporting my enrolment. Despite three statutory sittings, my application remains pending for over 1½ years without any legal justification from BCTNPY. Such an inordinate delay violates natural justice and fundamental rights.

While filing a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Madras is an option, I hesitate as it may consume significant time, further prolonging my enrolment. Moreover, while ignorance of law is no excuse, what about negligence of law by BCTNPY? Should an institution entrusted with upholding legal ethics be allowed to disregard settled precedents with impunity?

I appreciate the suggestion regarding a writ petition, but I also seek insights on additional legal remedies, including potential contempt proceedings against BCTNPY for disregarding judicial precedents. Any further guidance would be greatly appreciated.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     23 March 2025

No contempt proceedings is maintainable against bar council of Tamilnadu and Pondicherry because they have not disobeyed any order by court, besides you have not approached court at all then where is the question of contempt.

The citation in your possession is a guidance to proceed with and not an order or judgement against the bar council.

Don't waste your time anymore by waiting for the decision which is not forthcoming, instead look for remedy if you are really serious about your problem.

R.K Nanda (Advocate)     23 March 2025

What reasons bar council told you for delay? Inform. to get proper reply. 

VINAYAGAMPILLAI K (Awaiting Advocate enrolment)     24 March 2025

While filing a writ petition before the Hon’ble High Court is an available legal remedy, it is a time-consuming process. Considering the prolonged delay, alternative approaches have also been pursued. In this regard:

1. Appeal to Higher Judicial Authorities: A detailed representation has already been submitted to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India and the Hon’ble Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, highlighting the blatant disregard for precedents and violation of fundamental rights.

2. Deliberate Negligence of Precedents: The legal principle ignorantia juris non excusat (ignorance of law is no excuse) applies universally. However, what is the legal impact when a statutory body deliberately disregards 22 authoritative precedents—including 13 from the Hon’ble Supreme Court, 5 from the Madras High Court, 3 from the Allahabad High Court, and a landmark judgment from the Karnataka High Court—which directly apply to the case?

3. Recent Supreme Court Ruling on BCI’s Role: The Hon’ble Supreme Court recently clarified that the Bar Council of India has no authority to interfere with legal education. If the BCI itself cannot question the validity of legal education, on what basis does the BCTNPY continue to obstruct enrolment despite clear judicial pronouncements?

These aspects need serious consideration, as they go beyond mere procedural delay and indicate a deliberate and mala fide attempt to deny enrolment.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Recent Topics


View More

Related Threads


Loading