No query only TIME PASS
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 09 February 2014
No query only TIME PASS
revribhav (Hindi) 10 February 2014
During last 7 years I have the experience of participating in the video conference with various public authorities:-
1. It is only the officials of a particular insurance company who enjoy flight at the cost of public money to go personally at Delhi instead of attending the prescribed mode of vide conference.
All other public authority officials remain present through video conference.
2. RTI act was never intended to provide opportunity of making money to individuals,that is,CPIO or First appellate authority of a govt. of India company.
They have caused loss of public money of about Rs. one million so far in collusion with so called competent authority to sanction tour without mandate.
Anyone may google search for RTI decisions of Central Information Commission in respect of NIACL ,it shall be observed in most of the cases that RTI applicant was present through video confereence while CPIO or FAA or representive of insurance company was personally present.
3. The Rule /maxim of Law does not allow anyone to take advantage over the other one.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate) 10 February 2014