Dear All,
I purchased one house by paying 1 lakh in advance to Owner and made a nominal agreement on 100 rupees stamp with some terms and conditions without paying stamp duty. Now owner sold the property and made another agreement with some another third party and also hesitating for reimbursement of my money.
1. I am having photo copy of agreement and photo copy of other property document.
2. Loan sanctioned from other bank on basis of above.
3. Many Mobile voice recording of communication made with Owner.
4. I am having mediator in this transaction who can give evidence in my favour
5. Owner is having a bad track record so far and indulges in other such activities before this.
I want to know, can mobile recording considered as legal evidence? And
Request you to suggest on agreement photo copy because I don't have original one.
Will the photo copy serve as firm evidence?
Please suggest what should I do and what approach I should follow.
Thanks in advance...
