Grounds considered reasonable by Cr Courts for allowing adjournments for Cross Examination
I request my experienced Fellow Members to kindly discuss here grounds which are accepted as genuine by Criminal Courts for allowing adjournment for Cross Examination of a Prosecution Witness which has appeared and has been Examined in Chief
Is the ground that the accused needs a date for Cross Examination because he not being represented by a Lawyer, needs time to Study the Chief and make preparation before the cross examination is done to prepare for the questions to be confronted to bring out the truth, accepted as a genuine reason
