law always not rigid but flexible

It must be flexible Prof. At any point of time if iyt becomes regid there may eneter error in judgement in our system of evidence. It is not fools proof. Circumstantial, presuption, interested testimony etc are some grounds which negatives the regid theory. Always welcomes a flexible stand. Perhaps that may create less evil not grave evils.

The issue is not whether the pregnancy does not exceeds twelve weeks or twenty weeks, or whether the child born will be born with physical and mental abnormalities etc, as the MTPA has clearly lay down those aspects  in the act. The function of lawyer upholding human rights in this area is whether the embryo is human or not. If the answer is NO the matter ends there if the answer is yes, then whether this mother Earth is an abode for the fit and the perfect human beings only and that the abnormality is a ground for termination.

me so happy. our sr members made discussion of high degree of philosophical thoughts like VEDAS----which is nothing but a philosophy.grateful.

Flexibility  of thought help to deal with complex and difficult topics like medical termination of pregnancy especially in indian context HELPS to appreciate the situations of unique circumstances

where the veriable factors play a decisive role.rigidity would only waylay the real problem of MTPA