legal document

1.Property was bought from another person by registering .
2. Property was transferred to grandma in 1988 from my grandfather by gift deed.
3. Property transferred from my grandmother to my father by gift deed in 2002 divided into 2 half given to my uncle and half given to my father which is registered in registrar office.
4. My grandmother was alive while transferring the property.

There is no consistency in disclosing facts:

1)This is your contention in the first post: It was transferred before 2002. Is it necessary to register in the registrar office or is there any law not necessary to register office. As per the lawyer they said it was not necessary to register it property is more than 25 yrs old. Please clarify.  

2)The following is your final contention after 2 pages replies: 3. Property transferred from my grandmother to my father by gift deed in 2002 divided into 2 half given to my uncle and half given to my father which is registered in the registrar office. 4. My grandmother was alive

When your father is having a valid registered title deed in the form of Gift in 2002 What exactly you require in 2019 and in what way your sisters who were aware of the transaction in 2002 can raise objection ?

I have read the property document yesterday. My uncle has sold the half portion of property to someone in that document it is mentioned clearly that property was divided into two halves 1st half is my father's and 2nd half is my uncle's and my aunties has signed has witness.Is it enough?

The facts posted suggest that the property was not ancestral; it was self acquired and held by the grandfather as the absolute owner. He could dispose of the same at his discretion during lifetime. As such, the gift to the grandmother was valid if the deed had been duly registered. The same consideration apply to the subsequent gift made by the grandmother as well. In other words, the conveyance through the gifts were incomplete had the deeds been not registered. In such a case, the property had been rendered rendered interstate after the lifetime of the grandfather and/or grandmother and your aunts are vested withwith rights, title and interest in the property. In short, the decisive question is whether both the gifts were completed through registered deeds.

Originally posted by : P. Venu
	The facts posted suggest that the property was not ancestral; it was self acquired and held by the grandfather as the absolute owner. He could dispose of the same at his discretion during lifetime. As such, the gift to the grandmother was valid if the deed had been duly registered. The same consideration apply to the subsequent gift made by the grandmother as well. In other words, the conveyance through the gifts were incomplete had the deeds been not registered. In such a case, the property had been rendered intestate after the lifetime of the grandfather and/or grandmother and your aunts are vested withwith rights, title and interest in the property. In short, the decisive question is whether both the gifts were completed through registered deeds.