Nationality as a religion

@ Dr. MPS Ramani, Ph.D,

This is unfortunate that you being a highly literate person made a lazy observation to my post and thereby acted in a cavalier manner. No where in my post I commented that the "person is stupid" as allegedly claimed by you. I only remarked "In my view it is a stupid query....."   " Person is stupid" and " stupid query" does not equate the same meaning.

Thanks for your valuable suggestions and information. 1. First of all I want to cleared you all that.. . My this question is not for fun to anybody. 2. I am not that much intelligent as you ,bcoz I am not a lawyer, and just bcoz of that I asked you, to clear out my thoughts. 3. I know nationality and religion are different. 4. Main apne bachcho ke upar koi dharm thopna nahi chahta. Jab woh mature ho jayenge tab woh khud decide kare ki unhe kaunsa dharm follow karna hai. Na ki unke maa - baap woh follow kar rahe hai issi liye woh bhi follow kare. 5. "Scientology," yeh bhi ek dharm hai. (Hollywood actor tom cruze is following this religion) yeh dharm shuru hone se pehle bhi USA me koi law nahi tha iss religion ke hisab se, lekin yeh religion start toh ho hi gaya na. Mujhe koi naya dharm shuru nahi karna hai. Bas Main apne dharm se zyada apne desh se thoda zyada pyaar karta hu. issi liye yeh sawal tha. Mere janm se saath mera dharm juda hua tha. Lekin main nahi chahta ki mere bachche agar kal kuch alag though rakhte hai. toh unhe woh freedom milni chahiye. And last thing... Every child born as atheist, we makes them religious. Aaj sabse zyada debates religion pe hi hoti hai. .. aisi chiz pe jo kisi ke haath me hai hi nahi. Mera sawal bas yahi tha. . Ki Nationality as a religion use kar sakte hai ki nahi. Shayad sawal galat ho sakta hai. Lekin sawal puchna galat nahi hota.. Aisa main manta hu. Jo nahi pata wahi chiz toh hum puchchenge na...! Mujhe laws ke baare me kuch bhi nahi pata. .issi liye maine aap logon ko ek chhota sa sawal puchha tha. Agar kisi ko yeh stupid sawal lagta hoga... Toh beshaq aap mujhe stupid maan sakte ho.. bcoz apni apni soch bhi toh apne apne dharm jaise hi personal hoti hai. Thanks to all. Shekhar Koditkar.

Question of the author is whether he can use the expression "Indian" for purpose of religion? Can he adopt if his religion is "Indian"? If yes, then which enactment helps him? If no, then which enactment prevents him?

 

Religion is a freedom under Part III of the Constitution. Preventing the use of expression "Indian" for purpose of religion can only be done as per legal procedure established by law(due process).

 

To establish legal procedure by law, central or state legislature needs legislative powers to be delegated to it from the Constitution. For adoption the powers have been enumerated in entry number 5 in concurrent list.

 

Is central or state legislature getting legislative powers to prevent using the expression "Indian" for purpose of religion in Article 25 or anywhere in Part III or anywhere in the Constitution? Yes or no. It appears the answer is no.

 

If answer is yes, I would like to read the enactments of competent legislature that prevents the using of expression "Indian" for purpose of religion and prevent adoption for such persons. Religion and adoption are a matter of human rights of both adopter and adoptee. Human rights are part and parcel of Part III of the Constitution.