Need to know about this.....

You probably did not get clear reply due to below two reasons;

One - In husband – wife matters it is always better for themselves to sort each others issues out. Reference to and/or by third party always creates confusions.

Two – Unless reason as to why she moved out if not gets mentioned in the query then how one expects reply to once assumed satisfaction? Moreover in adjudications matters under matrimonial Laws there is nothing called I got 100% satisfaction it all boils around whether justice was done to me and to both Ld. Judges vs. Litigants delivering vs. seeking respective justice the meaning of justice delivered vs. sought also greatly differs.

However above being just pointers how adversial law in matrimonial suits plays its role even to near and dear once;

1. If she is not earning and is dependent then during subsisting marriage she may get maintenance which is purely based on arguments of Advocates from either side.

2. If she is not earning and is dependent and further shown to be earning earlier and now shown to be qualified then she can jolly well not get maintenance which is also purely based on arguments of Advocates from either side.

Clear answer can’t be given if only desertion is devoir here vs. clear answer can’t be given if for maintenance she is assumed to have deserted him.

Also I am not looking for answers to some of the above raised contentions as such pushed envelops always create confusions and it more or less generates mixed replies J . 

Thank you Tajobsindia, its quite a real answer.....

How can one go about further take this case forward....? if you feel suitable to sugest something......

he he

Wishes are horsesif I was her husband for good and for bad I would have the tenacity to answer directly to her then and there ..............

Frankly, ther is nothing he can directly say to her. its is only convincing the judge on this.

Matter has not reached to argument as yet, though, my Bro is all set to reason out and argue. hearing him he looks very confident on his very logical argument.

Still he is not sure what could be the outcome....

He now sounds more or less like me in reference to placed query J

[last reply from me let others share their thoughts]

Should my brother get into live in relationship while pending divorce since 1 year....?

Will it be Bigamy....? and ist is advisable to have kids further.....? 

Not advisable to start another relation till the time current one is legaly valid.