Muthukaruppan SV (software engineer) 08 May 2012
Guest (Guest) 08 May 2012
Dear Querist,
You would have to prove that you were not driving rashly and negligently, and it was the negligence of the deceased which resulted in the accident and his subsequent death. Any conviction under Section 304A can be mounted only if the prosecution succeeds in proving that the driver was driving the vehicle in a manner that was rash and negligent.
As regards the claim for compensation, you may plead the contributory negligence of the deceased which would mitigate the quantum of compensation. If the car was insured the insurance company would be liable to pay the same.
Attend the court on the next hearing with a lawyer who has good experience in handling motor accident cases.
Saurabh..V (Law Consultant) 09 May 2012
@Author
In your case there are two VERY IMPORTANT points:
- The deceased was drunk
- You wer driving with your 6 month old kid.
If the Post-mortem report prepared by the doctor does not show that the deceased was drunk then it would be against you.
Also even if you are driving @100Kmph then also its not Rash & Negligent only by the speed. There are many factors which are related with S.304A.
You would have to be brave and patient till this case is disposed-off by the court. You have not mentioed anywhere about your bail. Have you been granted bail by the court or police?
Please note that every evidence like the deceasaed directly hitting your windscreen, he was drunk, you wer driving with your 6month old kid, your car's photo at the place of accident etc., all would be very important during trial.
//peace
/Saurabh..V
Muthukaruppan SV (software engineer) 09 May 2012