Order 6 rule 17

Please post complete facts.

It is about a mat suit filed by husband in which wife filed a WS. Wife made a deliberate mistake while stating her 'status' in the affidavit. Then she filed a petition u/o 6 R17 for amending the same. Now the husband finds that in the body of WS, there are several deliberately made false/contradictory statements as reflected from the evidence given by her in two criminal cases. Both the criminal cases were decided against her. Now the question is since the statements of WS itself is proved wrong in other cases, can the WS be quashed and marriage disolved?