A tresspassed in the agriculture land of B and some portion of crops were destroyed. At the same time, A threatened B that he will constantly interfere in the land in future also.
B filed a suit of permanant injunction and the court decreed the suit in favour of B.
lateron, B filed suit for damages of crops. A contended that O2 r2 is applicable, as the cause of action of both suits are same, and that the B failed to claim the relief of damages in previous suit.
Q.1Whether cause of action is same in both cases?
Q.2what is cause of action in both the case?
