Perjury advice needed urgently

In Interim nothing can much be done, you will just have to pay it whatever it is.  Approach HC, SC, no use.  As it is only till case is pending, ie pendency of the case.You can summon her employer, that is the best method, asking for bank details via court is of no use, as all will be of past and not of present.  Only employers witness will help you prove in court that she is working.  So summon employer.

Perjury?  That is a bigg  joke.  and a waste of time.  Matrimonial cases itself are a waste of time, nobody will gain anything. and perjury to prove that she lied ? come on, court alredy knows that she is lying, and it is only a procedural and loop hole of the law which delays the case and make you both roam to court hall endlessly. 

Better to forget all this and go for MCD and part ways as good people.

She has committed perjury.

Sample petition is available in the following link.

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/details.asp?mod_id=104564&offset=3#.Ve55DtKeDGc

FAQs on Perjury are available on the following links.

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Why-speedy-trial-and-perjury--124820.asp#.Ve55kdKeDGc

Mr. TKG Reddi,

Giving contradictory statements on oath is also ground of Perjury and the magistrate should register the case as per Civil Manual Chapter XIX para 337 as a Miscellaneous Judicial Case. 

The magistrate should register the case ....   This means criminal court.   should or may?

For both Civil and Criminal courts if petion is made then. Civil Manual Chapter XIX -  only Civil court manual. For criminal court just file the perjury petition. It will be registered (If the Judge is not corrupted ).

CHAPTER XIX MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS REQUIRING JUDICIAL INQUIRY. 337. (i) Under the head Miscellaneous Judicial Proceedings are included all proceedings are enquiries of a judicial nature which do not form part of the proceedings in a suit or darkhast or appeal pending before the Court.  (ii) The expression includes :­ Proceedings under section 148­A of Civil Procedure Code, read with rules framed by the High Court under section 122 of Civil Procedure Code.   Proceedings of Applications under section 39, read with rule 22, Order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, for transfer of a decree to another Court for execution.  Proceedings under Regulation VIII of 1827. Proceedings under section 83 of the Transfer of Property Act ; Proceedings of judicial nature under the Guardians and wards Act; including under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act. Proceedings under section 340 and 345 Criminal Procedure Code. Proceedings under Order IX rules 4, 9 and 13 Civil Procedure Code. Proceedings under Order XXI, rule 2 to certify a payment when there is no darkhast pending; Granishee proceedings under rules 46­A to 46­I in order XXI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for attachment of debt under Rule 46(i). Proceeding under Order XXI, rules 58, 97 and 99 Civil Procedure Code. Proceedings on application under Order XXI, rules 89 and 90, Civil Procedure Code, to set aside a sale; Proceedings under Order XXXIII, rule 2, for permission to sue as an indigent person. Proceedings under Order XLI, rules 19 and 21 for readmission of a dismissed appeal or under Order XLI, rule 21, to re­hear an appeal decided ex­parte. Proceedings under section 24, Civil Procedure Code for transfer of suit, appeal or any proceedings etc. Proceedings under section 144, Civil Procedure Code for restitution etc. Proceedings under section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act; Proceedings under the Provincial Insolvency Act; Proceedings under Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925. Proceedings under section 24 of the Bombay Money Lenders Act; Proceeding under section 47 of the Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act; Proceedings on applications under Special Acts; And other proceedings on application in which relief is asked against a person not a party to suit or proceedings.

ld. advocate,
read news " Fake address epidemic has bailiffs on the run " in Pune Mirror | Sep 12, 2014, 02.30 AM IST and shocked to know it is a routine practise.
like to know why does not it attract 'perjury' to misguide the hon'ble court as well giving false information on sworn affidavit on oath.
regds.
be pleasant

You and other friends are welcome in this debit. Please remember the essence come out from a debate is the best one.

For the following  order my observation is -  

Queen-Empress vs Batesar Mandal on 24 March, 1884

I found : -

1. Accused appeared, made no objection to the form of the proceedings, and must be held to have waived the irregularity before the public servent (The Registrar ). Latter he filed perjury before the joint magistrate.

And U/s 195 CrPC.

1. (1) No Court shall take cognizance-
2. (a) (i) of any offence punishable under sections 172 to 188 (both inclusive) of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860 ), or
3. (ii) of any abetment of, or attempt to commit, such offence, or
4. (iii) of any criminal conspiracy to commit such offence, except on the complaint in writing of the public servant concerned or of some other public servant to whom he is administratively subordinate;

So the judgment is right – the court has not authority of commence perjury.  

"But who will be the Complainant?"

For IPC 498A who is the compliment along with your wife?

The STATE right?

For perjury also the STATE will be the compliment along with you.

Veerasami (1896) 19 Mad. 375 – I did not get this judgement in google.

What are you trying to establish by your posts? I am becoming confused.

a) If a public servant is complainant and/or court is complainant then basically the complainant is the STATE.

b) An affidavit is not evidence until it is notarized or testified before a magistrate.  How do you file your petition before court? After notarization and with an affidavit right? If the petition contains false concocted stories then it is a ground of perjury (giving false oath before public authority) because a notary is also a public authority who has testified the oath (not your advocate).

Now, if the notary seals are false or signatures are false then it is fraud document (ground of forgery)

c) You are confused on perjury and forgery. Please see the following links for details.

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Why-speedy-trial-amp-perjury--124819.asp#.VfAuPdKqqko

In one word: -

Producing false document contents on oath – Ground of Perjury.

Producing false documents – Ground of Forgery.

@ Mr. TGK Reddi,

I apology as I failed to convey my points and closing my discussion here.

Thank you.