Tarachand 03 February 2018
Tarachand 03 February 2018
Dear experts
In short can I make Registrar also as a party to the case because the first (Original) Order is issuance of direction to the Registrar
Regards
HARIOM
R Trivedi (advocate.dma@gmail.com) 04 February 2018
Tarachand 05 February 2018
Shri R Trivedi ji
I had sent you one email for work at Hon'ble Supreme Court
If not read the kindly read and reply
regard
HARIOM
Tarachand 25 April 2018
Sir Past details :- As stated above I had made the application u/s.340(1) of CRPC with prayers therein to prosecute and make complaint in writing u/s.191 and 193 of IPC against the Respondent before C.J.M. And the Court allowed my application and issued direction to Registrar to issue Notice to Respondent why perjury u/s.191 and 193 of IPC should not be initiated against him and the said Notice has been served to Respondent but NO Reply from Respondent Fresh Application :- Hence after 90 days I filed a Fresh application u/s.340(3) of CRPC before the same Judge on ground that once this Court had allowed my above application u/s.340(1) therefore it is now just, proper and necessary that this Court directs the Registrar or any other Officer to make complaint in writing before CJM against the Respondent u/s.191 and 193 of IPC BUT the same Judge again issued Notice to the Respondent, to which I objected but Judge said that he wants to know whether or not the Respondent had filed any Appeal u/s. 341 of CRPC before the Appellate Authority against his Order On last date the Respondent appeared before Court and filed Memo of Appearance and Application seeking time to file SAY I filed an affidavit that I inquired in Appellate Authority and say that the Respondent has neither filed any Appeal u/s. 341 of CRPC nor I received any summons/notice as such nor the Respondent mentioned thereabout Query Whether this Judge can allow any arguments on merit of case even after he had already allowed the application ? Whether the Respondent has any locus standi to file any SAY herein ? Can I press to make his complaint in writing as above because already the application has been allowed and Notice issued by Registrar is not replied by Respondent. OR WHAT TO DO TO CUT SHORT THIS UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE STRICTLY AS PER CRPC AND LAW please guide regard HARIOM
Tarachand 25 April 2018
Sir
Past details :-
As stated above I had made the application u/s.340(1) of CRPC with prayers therein to prosecute and make complaint in writing u/s.191 and 193 of IPC against the Respondent before C.J.M.
And the Court allowed my application and issued direction to Registrar to issue Notice to Respondent why perjury u/s.191 and 193 of IPC should not be initiated against him and the said Notice has been served to Respondent but NO Reply from Respondent
Fresh Application :-
Hence after 90 days I filed a Fresh application u/s.340(3) of CRPC before the same Judge on ground that once this Court had allowed my above application u/s.340(1) therefore it is now just, proper and necessary that this Court directs the Registrar or any other Officer to make complaint in writing before CJM against the Respondent u/s.191 and 193 of IPC
BUT the same Judge again issued Notice to the Respondent, to which I objected but Judge said that he wants to know whether or not the Respondent had filed any Appeal u/s. 341 of CRPC before the Appellate Authority against his Order
On last date the Respondent appeared before Court and filed Memo of Appearance and Application seeking time to file SAY
I filed an affidavit that I inquired in Appellate Authority and say that the Respondent has neither filed any Appeal u/s. 341 of CRPC nor I received any summons/notice as such nor the Respondent mentioned thereabout
Query
Whether this Judge can allow any arguments on merit of case even after he had already allowed the application ?
Whether the Respondent has any locus standi to file any SAY herein ?
Can I press to make his complaint in writing as above because already the application has been allowed and Notice issued by Registrar is not replied by Respondent.
OR WHAT TO DO TO CUT SHORT THIS UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE STRICTLY AS PER CRPC AND LAW
please guide
regard
HARIOM