Hi,
When a complaint against the prospective accused is dismissed by judicial magistrate and the complainant has filed a criminal revision application in sessions court and has made the state a party along with the prospective accused. Who has a larger role here to argue against the revision. Is it the state or the prospective accused.
Is it necessary at all for the prospective accused to enter these proceedings or is it more a role for the lawyer of the state to argue in favor of the decision of the JM. please let me know as I am a prospective accused in this and have received the summons for session court hearing. I am still deciding whether or not it is mandatory for me to join the proccedings.