Property

what is the reson for not agreeing for settlement?

I dont agree with you. There must be strong reason for her unwillingness. Try to ascertain it and solve the problem amicably with the help of your mother.

according to me this is a small issue which can be sorted out by convinsing her.

pl call me

Your posts affirm that you are all Hindu/Hindu Succession Laws apply in your case and your decased Father (title holder) has not left any valid WILL.

Succession opens on date of death; by inheritance or by testamentary succession (by valid WILL).

In case of Hindu male dying without disposing her estate/property in her life time by a valid/registered deed the 1st right is of ClassI legal heirs i.e Mother (if alive as on date of death), Wife (if alive as on date of death), sons, daughters……

In case of deceased Hindu woman dying without disposing her estate/property in her life time by a valid/registered deed ClassI,II is not applicable rather nature and source of property matters.

If the property is self acquired/earned/absolute in the hands of Hindu woman the 1st right is of her husband (if alive as on date of death) and sons, daughters…………

If property is acquired from husband side 1st right is of her sons, daughters…………and if sons, daughters are not available then legal heirs of husband..

If property is acquired from parents side 1st right is of her sons, daughters…………and if sons, daughters are not available then legal heirs of father..

GO thru; Hindu Succession Act; 22, 23

The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005

Supreme Court of India

Narashimaha Murthy vs Smt. Susheelabai & Ors on 17 April, 1996

Equivalent citations: 1996 AIR 1826, 1996 SCC (3) 644

Author: K Ramaswamy

Bench: Ramaswamy, K.

Supreme Court of India : Prakash & Ors. Vs. Phulavati & Ors; [SLP (C) Nos.21814 of 2008, 18744 of 2010, 28702-28703 of 2010, 28471 of 2011, 4217-4218 of 2012, 1299-1300 of 2013, 17577-17578 of 2013, 19816 of 2014, 5619 of 2015, 3805 of 2008, 9390 of 2015, 5680 of 2015, 35209 of 2011 and 15557-15558 of 2015 and SLP. (C) ....15560 of 2015]

 [Civil Appeal No.7217 of 2013]

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.

Supreme Court of India

Danamma @ Suman Surpur vs Amar on 1 February, 2018

Author: A Sikri

Bench: A Bhushan, A Sikri

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 188-189 OF 2018

                                      [@SLP(C) Nos. 10638-10639 of 2013]

     SUPREME COURT OF INDIA:

   Sita Ram Bhama Vs. Ramvatar Bhama

[Civil Appeal No................of 2018 arising out of SLP (C) No.11067 of 2017]

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

THE LIMITATION ACT, 1963; Article; 109, 110

And an illustrated judgment by Dist Courts;

Delhi District Court

Judgment:­ vs . on 17 March, 2017

                                             1

 In the court of Ashwani Kumar Sarpal, Additional District Judge­1,

             North East District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi

                           Civil Suit no.­ 476496/15

                             Sh. Sumat Prasad Jain

                                            vs.

                       Sh. Bhagwan Dass Jain & Others

                                                 Initial Date of filing of the suit­­­­­­­­­­­08.03.2001

                                                 Date when the plaint was refiled -­­­­­­21.10.2009

                                                 Date when order was reserved­­­­­­­­--01.03.2017

                                                 Date of final decision­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­17.03.2017

   (Suit for Partition, Possession and Permanent Injunction)

                          ========================

Now,   the   suit   property   is   to   be   divided   by   metes   and bounds   and   it   is   to   be   decided   whether   physical   partition   of   the property is possible or not and if it is possible, then which portion will go   to   which   of   the   party.     This   court   can   appoint   a   Local Commissioner   also   to   give   suggestion   for   physical   partition   of   the property   but   before   that   I   want   to   give   an   opportunity   to   all   the entitled parties to sit together and give any suggestion or any other solution   for   amicable   settlement   which   can   include   purchase   of another's   case   after   fixing   the   market   value.     In   case   no   such suggestion came forward, then the appropriate steps will be taken to pass the final decree after appointing a Local commissioner.