------------------------------------------
Posting on a behalf of a kind hearted old lady who needs your help
------------------------------------------
Dear brothers and sisters,
I compromised out of court in a succession case and entered into a notarized agreement. I have also given my no objection affidavit for taking back my application in land registrar office to prohibit sale of large plot worth 3 cr. Plot is now sold and the other party received money already. The cheque mentioned in the compromise agreement was 3 month PDC and can be deposited after 2 weeks as 2 and half months already passed. the condition in agreement was I can encash the cheque only after other party gets the money from sale of plot.
I just came to know that the cheque given to me is not of other party but one of his business partner. that business partner is already facing (enjoying?) several cheque bounse cases and has a lawer who is expert in sec 138 cases.
Now the other party is asking me to reduce the compensation agreed to 10L while the agreement mentions 20L based on following points
1. My claim on property was weak as I am second wife of my late husband married for 30 years. We are all Hindu. first wife is alive and was married for 42 yrs. my husband kept our marriage socially hidden and always flaunted his first wife and son in front of society. none of the relatives from his side approve of me. I was brought up in orphan home and have no relatives.
2. my husband did not make any will and his first wife is nominee in insurance, bank and all such places.
3. The other party agreed to my (now unresonable?) demand of 20L as they wanted to avoid loss of money due to delay in sale of that 3 cr. plot.
4. Sec 138 will not be applicable as the cheque is for compromise money as per one Delhi HC case.
5. the cheque given bears genuine signature and is of a valid working account and the compromise agreement does not explicitly state that it belongs to the first wife or her son. Unfortunately the cheque dose not show name of the account holder as like private bank cheque.
6. I have already given my No objection affidavit in succession case filed by them where they made me respondent and court issued it to first wife and her son. I was dragging on this case for 2 years in a hope for out of court settlement due to my weak legal position.
7. If I file cheque bounce case or try to reopen the property dispute, I will have to fight long legal battle and the other party will ensure that they will keep all cases pending and I have very slim chance to win against them.
8. I do not have any source of income and my bank balance is almost nil. I do not have the money to pay stamp duty for all the property value if I go to court and reopen property dispute. In this situation it is better for me to take the reduced settlement offer of 10L.
Please advice what I could do in this situation. What are my chances to get the full 20L amount through legal battle ? First wife’s son told me through a relative that if I do not accept their offer of 10L, he will ensure that I will keep fighting in court very long and painful battle and he will spend even 50L to ensure that I will not receive a single rupee.
I am old, never worked in my life and have no relatives and family. Now I am giving tuitions to few primary school kids to support myself. I dedicated my entire life to my late husband and now facing this hardship. I am ready to fight if I have chances of winning. My lawyer in the succession case showed me dreams of winning and later cajoled me to enter into compromise. Please help your sister in this difficult time. God bless you.
-Sunanda