LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

r.sankaranarayanan (Official)     30 August 2011

Redevelopment of housing society's property in mumbai

In Mumbai the Co-operative Housing Societies go for redevelopment. As per the Co-operation Department's notification dated 3rd January, 2009 the procedure is laid down. Rule 79 (a) has to be complied with if the Society wants to go for redevelopment. Rule 79 (a) stipulates that the General Body meeting for appointing the builder has to be conducted with an official from Dy. Registrar's Office, wherein the attendance should be atleast 75% of membership strength and the resolution appointing the builder should be passed with 75% of those present. In our Housing Society there are 37 members, of which 9 are shopkeeper members whose demands are unreasonable. The number of members who were present at the General Body meeting which was videographed, was 27, with more than 75% of them having approved the appointment of the builder. But the Dy. Registrar says that atleast 28 members should have been present. I can not have the meeting again since all the shopkeeper members + one flat owner i.e 10 members will be present and even 75% support of the memebrs present will not be there. We had followed many stipulations before arriving at this point. Many judgements of the Mumbai High Court have said that minority can not block the redevelopment process. Majority of the members are not in favour of repairs and they want redevelopment only. I am given to understand that the Minister of Co-operation can waive the stipulation under Rule 79 (a), but to get this job done is not easy. Can anybody guide me as to how to proceed further?



Learning

 2 Replies

DILIP SHAH (Senior Counselor and Analyst for Redevelopment of Housing Societies)     01 September 2011

 

No. The Minister of Co-operation can not waive the stipulation under Rule 79 (a). Yor are certainly right that many judgements of the Mumbai High Court have said that minority can not block the redevelopment process. However, to get such judgment, you have no other way but to approach the High Court against the non-agreeing members.

 

If the minority dissenting members do not have points on merits and if the Society has gone by the law, the minority may ultimately lose before the law.

Dilip Shah

Senior Counselor and Analyst for Redevelopment of Housing Societies

dilip7shah@gmail.com

9819825752

32411533

nandita (executive)     20 May 2014

Seek your guidance as regards redevelopment of our society of ten members wherein the conveyance is pending and the owner of the property(i.e. One of the legal heirs) on which our buulding stands wants to redevelop. He will convey the property in favour once redevpt is through. As chairperson i am eager that d conveyance is done prior to redevpt. Its an old bldg over 30 years. And d original owner was agreeing to transfer but d society delayed n she has since passed away. Please advise.

Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register