Restoration of 125 crpc / perjury

two facts are not mixed up. one hand you are saying that the restoration application is unsigned and only enclosed with an affidavit of the lawyer and the other hand you are saying that the signature of the litigant is forged by his counsel. It may be clarified here that the proceeding for perjury can be going on against both the person

Thank You 

Sir, The application for restoration has been filed after a lapse of nearly six months from the date of getting dismisssed in default. The lawyer has filed teh application for restoration without the signature of the petitioner and the affidavit filed with a forged signature of the deponenet/petitioner.

So my query is ;

a) Can a CRPC 125 be restored after a lapse of six months from the date of getting dismissed in default does it get governed with limitation act 122? Is there a provision in CRPC for restoration after getting dismissed in default?

b) Since the affidavit filed along with the application for restoration is carrying a forged signature of the deponent/petitioner which is in TOTAL variance of the signature on record of the court file as compared to the signature in the original petition what action can be taken against the petitioner and the person responsible for submitting a affidavit in court with forged signature ? Does it attract perjury proceedings ?

Regards