Sanjeev Dudhat (Lawyer) 18 October 2008
K.C.Suresh (Advocate) 18 October 2008
Dear Sanjeev
Do you think that the family courts are functioning aiming the object of the said Act by the aid of this councillors in whom some are immoral, drunkards, corrupt preferably probation officers. Is it what the Nation dream of with that Act and procedure. How many non-perverts are there in the dias for dealing the family dispute. Is the authority ever think of the family relation life of a judge in that court. A disrupted, immoral, dejected, perverted, family troubled, egoist whether he can deal the case of a family either as councilor or judge is the question. There are so many good, fair and pious amoung so many bad and ugly. Find the good at least the average for the said posts. At present the councilling is a mechanical process without any benfits to the families.
Sankaranarayanan (Advocate) 18 October 2008
now a day the terminology of cousuling is fationed one. but some time it is materilised bcz normal trend of human beeings, the advise by the parents or senior or any close cirlcle not been accepted, but by the proffesional have know some way of approch to convence , so now a days it also vital
Rajan Salvi (Lawyer) 18 October 2008
There should be a form / questionarre which the Counsellor has to fill up. Format of his report should also be prescribed. The source of his knowledge while filing up the format has to be mentioned. CAN WE FORUM MEMBERS COME UP WITH A QUESTIONNARE and FORMAT OF A COUNSELLORS REPORT? It is easy and should be like giving an objective test with some space for additional remarks ,if any.
Sanjeev Dudhat (Lawyer) 19 October 2008
I fully agree with Rajan. lot of positivity in his approach. However an advocate's perspective is restricted only to legal aspect of the case. a knowledgable pyschologist can also contricbute to prepare a questionaire. Lets work it out?