Lakhera (None) 31 July 2010
surendrababu (self) 02 August 2010
In N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy (AIR 1998 SC 3222) it was held by Supreme Court that Section 5 is to be construed liberally so as to do substantial justice to the parties. The provision contemplates that the Court has to go in the position of the person concerned and to find out if the delay can be said to have been resulted from the cause which he had adduced and whether the cause can be recorded in the peculiar circumstances of the case is sufficient
. In the same judgment referred to above the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
"
In view of the above observations made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Exparte Decree is set asidable amd by refusing to condone the delay, the petitioner should not be allowed to face the drastic consequences of exparte decree
Further, in
While condoning the delay, the court should not forget the opposite party altogether. It must be borne in mind that he is a loser and he too would have incurred quite large litigation expenses. It would be a salutary guideline that when court condone the delay due to laches on the part of the applicant, the Court shall compensate the opposite party for his loss.
R.Ranganathan (Advocate) 19 September 2010
You can file the Petition to set aside the exparte decree but the court will see the reasons for not attending court, how many times you have remained absent, etc., Also you have to give proper explanation satisfying the court for the delay in filing the Sec. 5 application.