If we go by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Harman Electronic, the complaint has to be instituted at Nagpur i.e. where the drawer of the cheque resides. Please peruse the below comment for more clarification.
In the judgment of Harman Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. and Anr V/s
i. K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidyyan Balan and Anr. MANU/SC/0625/1999
ii. Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Ltd. v. Galaxy Traders and Agencies Ltd. and Ors. MANU/SC/0041/2001
iii. State of Punjab v. Amar Singh Harika MANU/SC/0314/1966
iv. State of Punjab v. Khemi Ram MANU/SC/0434/1969
v. Sultan Sadik v. Sanjay Raj Subba and Ors. MANU/SC/0004/2004
vi. Mosaraf Hossain Khan v. Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd. MANU/SC/8067/2006
vii. Y.A. Ajit v. Sofana Ajit MANU/SC/7888/2007.
In view of the aforesaid, now opinion of the Hon’ble supreme court stand divided for the reason that the Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. and Anr V/s
Unless there is a judgment of three judge bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the confusion/uncertainty with regard to territorial jurisdiction of court will be prevalent among the judges and advocates.
Suggest you to peruse the aforesaid judgment for indepth clarity.
Regards,
Ravish Kumar