LCI Learning
Master the Art of Contract Drafting & Corporate Legal Work with Adv Navodit Mehra. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

section 138 of negotiable instruments act

Page no : 2

Dharmesh Manjeshwar (Advocate/Lawyer)     24 July 2010

I doubt whether there is such a judgement of the apex court ........

Anil Agrawal (Retired)     26 July 2010

Is it a verification statement u/s 200 of CrPC. Read the attached judgement and please comment.

 

VERIFICATION

I, _____________, age _____, occupation business, residing at __________ do hereby state on solemn affirmation that in pursuance of existing liability s mentioned in complaint,

accused has issued three cheques ______________.

That on _____ all three cheques were presented in our bank account. On _____ the bank returned all three cheques with remarks NOT ARRANGED FOR.

Therefore notice was issued to the accused on _____. The accused have not paid the amount of ____. Hence it is requested that process be issued against accused.

Sd/ Complainant.

Before Me

Sd/ MM


Attached File : 49 49 judge oka s judgement.doc downloaded: 168 times

mazharul (Advocate)     28 July 2010

Can you provide me with the Indian SC guideline about cheque dishonored case


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register