hitman hitman 23 September 2019
Isaac Gabriel (Advocate) 24 September 2019
In this affair, conscience rather than law, if respected, giving share is the right perspective since you do not deny the payment by three..
Real Soul.... (LEGAL) 24 September 2019
If he has invested then why would you turn dihonest and refuse him his rightful due. Just give him his share;
Legally he will bring in shiut for partition and by way of evidance will prove that he has invested in the property equally.
G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.) 24 September 2019
Even for denial, there should be a justification of arguments for the status of self acquiring, what was your income at that time, and whether it is probable to earn that property at that age with your income after sustenance is sufficient or not has to be decided by the court. Irrespective of the actual amount contributed, if the contribution is not in writing, everyone is entitled to an equal share.
hitman hitman 24 September 2019
P. Venu (Advocate) 24 September 2019
Yes you know thr truth; act truthfully.
G.L.N. Prasad (Retired employee.) 24 September 2019
Never underestimate an opponent and step into litigation. Do your duty lawfully and avoid unnecessary litigation at a late age as litigation disrupts relations financially, mentally and physically.
hitman hitman 24 September 2019
Shashi Dhara 28 September 2019