Dear Sir,
If the boy family resident of Delhi as been falsely implicated under section 498-A/406/506 sections but not under Dowry Prohibition Act at remote areas and Boy’s family get arrested and take regular bail and trail too taking place at remote areas. Thereafter girl filed case of 125 CrPC.
In FIR the girls’ family has admitted that they have given huge valauable things at the occassion of marriage without complying the list which needs to made under rules and expenditure is too high as compare to their financial status The alleged statement in FIR as well in his written complaint and statements made in clearly shows that they has committed offence under section 3 of D.P Act-1961 as giving and taking of dowry is crime.Apart from this on persaul of FIR there is no where stated that any family member of boy has ever demanded dowry or has taken dowry from them
In the view of circumstances the boy family who is residing in delhi can file the case before Metropolitan Magistrate about the registering of crime . Many experts of this forum ( which I have seen in some texts) don’t agree and indicated that giving dowry means that you have taken dowry and section 7(3) clearly provides immunity to the aggrieved from offences
And as per judgement made by Hon’ble High Court in CRLMC that book the girl family who is taking dowry and many mens forum too agree to impose this section on girls family
Please comment as marriage took place in delhi, and matrimonial home is also located in Delhi, whether its advisable to proceed with this before they implicate the boy’s family on taking the dowry or gift articles
