IMMEDIATE LEGAL QUESTIONS HAUNTING INDIAN STAFFING COMPANIES
Dear All
In continuation of our earlier post on the subject :
Questions are raised on the rotation of employees of contractors working with Principal Employers ,
The Contractor’s employees are working in XYZ co. [Client] and the employees are on the Contractors pay roll. The Contractor provides them PF . ESIC , Gratuity ,bonus , leave salary ,etc, But the Principal Employer wants rotation of the Contractor Employees who have completed 180 days and wants appointment of new employees in the place of left employees,
Can the request be acceded because ,all the employees are on the permanent rolls of the Contractor and not on contract basis.
The request of the Client can be accepted and is meant to provide break of service from continuous employment. Otherwise the Staffing Company or Contractor will lose business .The concept of continuous employment is found in Sec 25 B of the Industrial Disputes Act .
25-B. Definition of continuous service: -- For the purpose of this Chapter,-
(1) a workman shall be said to be in continuous service for a period if he is, for that period, in uninterrupted service, including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness or authorized leave or an accident or a strike which is not illegal, or a lock-out or a cessation of work which is not due to any fault on the part of the workman;
(2) Where a workman is not in continuous service within the meaning of clause (1) for a period of one year or six months, he shall be deemed to be in continuous service under an employer—
(a) for a period of one year, if the workman, during a period of twelve calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than—
(i) one hundred and ninety days in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and
(ii) two hundred and forty days, in any other case;
(b) for a period of six months, if the workman, during a period of six calendar months preceding the date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer for not less than—
(i) ninety five days, in the case of a workman employed below ground in a mine; and
(ii) one hundred and twenty days, in any other case;
Explanation: -- For the purpose of clause (2), the number of days on which a workman has actually worked under an employer shall include the days on which—
(i) he has been laid-off under an agreement or as permitted by standing orders made under the Industrial Employment [Standing Orders] Act, 1946 (20 of 1946), or under this Act or under any other law applicable to the Industrial establishment;
(ii) he has been on leave with full wages, earned in the previous years;
(iii) he has been absent due to temporary disablement caused by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment; and
(iv) in the case of a female, she has been on maternity leave; so, however, that the total period of such maternity leave does not exceed twelve weeks.
The Client from their end want to overcome the “continuous employment of the Contractor’s employee with them "for various reasons like avoiding a claim for permanency from the Contractor’s employees and this cannot be faulted. In case the employees are permanent on the Contractor’s rolls which means you need to swap your employees between different Clients. From the "dedicated" mode of deputation a need may arise to switch to "multiple" mode. This is where the Indian Temp Staff Industry must aim to go..The Appointment Letter and Agreement with the Contractors Staff has to be tuned to take care of all this with expert legal help.
There are many inter-related issues to this which we will address in our further posts.
With Regards
V.Sounder Rajan
VS Rajan Associates,
Advocates & Notaries -Legal Consultants
No.27, Ist Floor, Singapore Plaza,
No.164, Linghi Chetty Street,
Chennai - 600 001.
E-mail : rajanassociates@eth,net,
Off : 044-42620864, 044-65874684,
Mobile : 9025792684.