State as a necessary party

Is there  something wrong with the query?

as you said that it is a government property laid a pathway and government should be the party and they should file there counter and also defendants has to file there counter defending and prove there statement with evidences and with all this court will pass order and as the path is a obstructing plaintiff 

In continuation of above thread I further submit that if the state has been joined in  the suit and the jr,court trying the suit thereby  loses jurisdiction to try the suit  whether the  jr.court will have jurisdiction to continue Status quo order  which was already operative against non state parties?  so that any mischief may not be created as to status quo order in the intervening and transit period  I.e transfer of case file  from one court to another, what is the remedy  in such a case ?